SoK: Bitcoin Layer Two (L2)

In this article, we present the first Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) on constructing Layer Two (L2) solutions for Bitcoin. We carefully examine a representative subset of ongoing Bitcoin L2 solutions (40 out of 335 extensively investigated cases) and provide a concise yet impactful identification of six classic design patterns through two approaches (i.e., modifying transactions and creating proofs). Notably, we are the first to incorporate the inscription technology (emerged in mid-2023), along with a series of related innovations. We further establish a reference framework that serves as a baseline criterion ideally suited for evaluating the security aspects of Bitcoin L2 solutions, and which can also be extended to broader L2 applications. We apply this framework to evaluate each of the projects we investigated. We find that the inscription-based approaches introduce new functionality (i.e., programability) to Bitcoin systems, whereas existing proof-based solutions primarily address scalability challenges. Our security analysis reveals new attack vectors targeting data/state (availability, verification), assets (withdrawal, recovery), and users (disputes, censorship).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Computing Surveys
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3763232
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SoK: Bitcoin Layer Two (L2)

Tianqing Zhu, Shiping Chen, William J. Knottenbelt, Thomas Hardjono et al.
2 citations
ACM Computing Surveys
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
6.49
article

SoK: Bitcoin Layer Two (L2)

Tianqing Zhu, Shiping Chen, William J. Knottenbelt, Thomas Hardjono, Minfeng Qi, Qin Wang, Zhipeng Wang, Manvir Schneider
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this article, we present the first Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) on constructing Layer Two (L2) solutions for Bitcoin. We carefully examine a representative subset of ongoing Bitcoin L2 solutions (40 out of 335 extensively investigated cases) and provide a concise yet impactful identification of six classic design patterns through two approaches (i.e., modifying transactions and creating proofs). Notably, we are the first to incorporate the inscription technology (emerged in mid-2023), along with a series of related innovations. We further establish a reference framework that serves as a baseline criterion ideally suited for evaluating the security aspects of Bitcoin L2 solutions, and which can also be extended to broader L2 applications. We apply this framework to evaluate each of the projects we investigated. We find that the inscription-based approaches introduce new functionality (i.e., programability) to Bitcoin systems, whereas existing proof-based solutions primarily address scalability challenges. Our security analysis reveals new attack vectors targeting data/state (availability, verification), assets (withdrawal, recovery), and users (disputes, censorship).

ACM Computing SurveysVol. 58(3)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), University of Manchester (GB), Moscow Institute of Thermal Technology (RU), IIT@MIT (US), Favaloro Foundation (AR), Data61 (AU), Imperial College London (GB), City University of Macau (MO), Swiss National Science Foundation (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.