A Proposed Model for Policies and Procedural Tasks to Develop Curriculum in General Education Stages Based on Beauchamp’s Model of Curriculum Engineering

This research aimed to construct a model for curriculum development in general-education stages that incorporates clear and specific policies and procedural tasks by adopting an approach aligned with Beauchamp’s Curriculum Engineering Model as a potential alternative to the model currently applied in Saudi Arabia. To achieve this, a descriptive-analytical methodology was employed via a survey review of the scientific literature on curriculum development and Beauchamp’s Curriculum Engineering Model. In light of these reviews, a proposed curriculum-development model was constructed, comprising four phases: planning, implementation, follow-up and evaluation. A corresponding list of policies and procedural tasks was then developed and presented in the form of a closed-open questionnaire. The Delphi Technique was applied by submitting this list to five purposively selected curriculum and instruction experts over two rounds, with individual discussions held after each round. The findings yielded a model grounded in curriculum-engineering principles based on analytical and inferential literature reviews and identified 24 procedural policies encompassing 66 procedural tasks across the planning, implementation, follow-up and evaluation phases. Finally, the research recommended that these policies and tasks be reviewed, refined and approved by the relevant curriculum authorities and thereafter employed in curriculum design and development processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qubahan Academic Journal
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v5n3a1732
Primary Topic
Educational Systems and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Proposed Model for Policies and Procedural Tasks to Develop Curriculum in General Education Stages Based on Beauchamp’s Model of Curriculum Engineering

Ali Hassan Hussein Al-Ahmadi
Qubahan Academic Journal
Educational Systems and Policies
article

A Proposed Model for Policies and Procedural Tasks to Develop Curriculum in General Education Stages Based on Beauchamp’s Model of Curriculum Engineering

Ali Hassan Hussein Al-Ahmadi
article en

Abstract

This research aimed to construct a model for curriculum development in general-education stages that incorporates clear and specific policies and procedural tasks by adopting an approach aligned with Beauchamp’s Curriculum Engineering Model as a potential alternative to the model currently applied in Saudi Arabia. To achieve this, a descriptive-analytical methodology was employed via a survey review of the scientific literature on curriculum development and Beauchamp’s Curriculum Engineering Model. In light of these reviews, a proposed curriculum-development model was constructed, comprising four phases: planning, implementation, follow-up and evaluation. A corresponding list of policies and procedural tasks was then developed and presented in the form of a closed-open questionnaire. The Delphi Technique was applied by submitting this list to five purposively selected curriculum and instruction experts over two rounds, with individual discussions held after each round. The findings yielded a model grounded in curriculum-engineering principles based on analytical and inferential literature reviews and identified 24 procedural policies encompassing 66 procedural tasks across the planning, implementation, follow-up and evaluation phases. Finally, the research recommended that these policies and tasks be reviewed, refined and approved by the relevant curriculum authorities and thereafter employed in curriculum design and development processes.

Qubahan Academic JournalVol. 5(3)
Islamic University of Madinah (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Educational Systems and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.