Ecodependence: The Intrinsic Connection between Living and Killing

This article fleshes out the concept of ecodependence, situating it in discussions about more-than-human relationality and biopolitics. In ecofeminist discourses, ecodependence emphasizes human dependency on natural resources, whereas the notion of interdependence focuses on interpersonal relationships. The article critiques a distinction between these types of dependency and opposes the related tendency to romanticize more-than-human relationality. In contrast, it develops an understanding of ecodependence that foregrounds the ambivalent and destructive qualities of relationality. Through an analysis of Maria Mies’ ecofeminist framework, the article identifies two dimensions of ecodependence: one structural and one ontological. Ecofeminist accounts incline toward idealizing dependency in the latter sense. By engaging with the works of Donna Haraway and Jacques Derrida, the article proposes a conceptualization of ecodependence that acknowledges the destructive character of relationality not only structurally but also on an ontological level. It points out the intrinsic connection between living and killing, leading to a perspective of affirmative thanatopolitics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theory Culture & Society
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764251363194
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecodependence: The Intrinsic Connection between Living and Killing

Katharina Hoppe
Theory Culture & Society
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

Ecodependence: The Intrinsic Connection between Living and Killing

Katharina Hoppe
article en

Abstract

This article fleshes out the concept of ecodependence, situating it in discussions about more-than-human relationality and biopolitics. In ecofeminist discourses, ecodependence emphasizes human dependency on natural resources, whereas the notion of interdependence focuses on interpersonal relationships. The article critiques a distinction between these types of dependency and opposes the related tendency to romanticize more-than-human relationality. In contrast, it develops an understanding of ecodependence that foregrounds the ambivalent and destructive qualities of relationality. Through an analysis of Maria Mies’ ecofeminist framework, the article identifies two dimensions of ecodependence: one structural and one ontological. Ecofeminist accounts incline toward idealizing dependency in the latter sense. By engaging with the works of Donna Haraway and Jacques Derrida, the article proposes a conceptualization of ecodependence that acknowledges the destructive character of relationality not only structurally but also on an ontological level. It points out the intrinsic connection between living and killing, leading to a perspective of affirmative thanatopolitics.

Theory Culture & SocietyVol. 43(1)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.