Battle of sects? Iran and Saudi Arabia’s role conflict

Abstract How do secular and religious national role conceptions (NRCs) influence interstate rivalry? To explore this, we examine the rivalry between Iran and Saudi Arabia, two theocratic states. Drawing on scholarship that integrates power politics and religion, we examine how instrumental motivations shape religion-based policymaking. Using semantic network and regression analyses on data from eight official Twitter/X accounts of Iranian and Saudi foreign policy officials (2015–2021), we find that both states’ officials strategically use secular and religious NRCs in response to foreign policy roles adopted by their rival. Our findings underscore the coexistence of these NRCs and their selective application in managing rivalry. Methodologically, the study contributes to foreign policy analysis research by employing quantitative semantic analysis of social media data. It also offers a novel lens for understanding Iran-Saudi competition and the broader intersection of religion and foreign policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NPL report DEM-TQD
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755048325100126
Primary Topic
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Battle of sects? Iran and Saudi Arabia’s role conflict

Özgür Özdamar, Babak RezaeeDaryakenari, Yasemin Akbaba
NPL report DEM-TQD
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
article

Battle of sects? Iran and Saudi Arabia’s role conflict

Özgür Özdamar, Babak RezaeeDaryakenari, Yasemin Akbaba
article en

Abstract

Abstract How do secular and religious national role conceptions (NRCs) influence interstate rivalry? To explore this, we examine the rivalry between Iran and Saudi Arabia, two theocratic states. Drawing on scholarship that integrates power politics and religion, we examine how instrumental motivations shape religion-based policymaking. Using semantic network and regression analyses on data from eight official Twitter/X accounts of Iranian and Saudi foreign policy officials (2015–2021), we find that both states’ officials strategically use secular and religious NRCs in response to foreign policy roles adopted by their rival. Our findings underscore the coexistence of these NRCs and their selective application in managing rivalry. Methodologically, the study contributes to foreign policy analysis research by employing quantitative semantic analysis of social media data. It also offers a novel lens for understanding Iran-Saudi competition and the broader intersection of religion and foreign policy.

NPL report DEM-TQDVol. 18(4)
Leiden University (NL), Bilkent University (TR), Gettysburg College (US)
Universiteit Leiden, Gratama Stichting
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Battle of sects? Iran and Saudi Arabia’s role conflict — Özgür Özdamar, Babak RezaeeDaryakenari, et al. · NPL report DEM-TQD (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS