Descriptive and injunctive emotion norms and identification influence group-based emotions

We investigated the simultaneous influence of descriptive and injunctive ingroup emotion norms and ingroup identification on group-based emotions triggered by ingroup-relevant events (Experiment 1) and by outgroup targets (Experiment 2). For both studies, we hypothesized that both perceived descriptive and injunctive emotion norms would influence experienced emotions (self-categorization effects), effects that would be moderated by identification (with high identifiers being more influenced by norms than low identifiers). We also expected identification to increase the relative positivity of ingroup-relevant emotions in Experiment 1. In each study, we activated ingroup membership, assessed ingroup identification, and then measured group-based emotions and participants’ perceptions of the ingroup’s descriptive and injunctive emotion norms. Both experiments produced strong evidence for independent effects of both descriptive and injunctive emotion norms on experienced emotion. However, evidence for the moderation of those effects by identification was inconsistent and qualified. Identification increased the relative positivity of ingroup-relevant emotions in Experiment 1 as predicted. We conclude that the role of self-categorization processes in constructing the subjective sense of group membership receives strong support in the group-based emotion domain, and discuss the implications of our results for understanding the role of identification in these studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302251353144
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Descriptive and injunctive emotion norms and identification influence group-based emotions

Diane M. Mackie, Eliot R. Smith, Asha Weisman, Megan Reed et al.
1 citations
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Cultural Differences and Values
article

Descriptive and injunctive emotion norms and identification influence group-based emotions

Diane M. Mackie, Eliot R. Smith, Asha Weisman, Megan Reed, Rammy M. Salem, Bailey Immel, Janet V. T. Pauketat
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We investigated the simultaneous influence of descriptive and injunctive ingroup emotion norms and ingroup identification on group-based emotions triggered by ingroup-relevant events (Experiment 1) and by outgroup targets (Experiment 2). For both studies, we hypothesized that both perceived descriptive and injunctive emotion norms would influence experienced emotions (self-categorization effects), effects that would be moderated by identification (with high identifiers being more influenced by norms than low identifiers). We also expected identification to increase the relative positivity of ingroup-relevant emotions in Experiment 1. In each study, we activated ingroup membership, assessed ingroup identification, and then measured group-based emotions and participants’ perceptions of the ingroup’s descriptive and injunctive emotion norms. Both experiments produced strong evidence for independent effects of both descriptive and injunctive emotion norms on experienced emotion. However, evidence for the moderation of those effects by identification was inconsistent and qualified. Identification increased the relative positivity of ingroup-relevant emotions in Experiment 1 as predicted. We conclude that the role of self-categorization processes in constructing the subjective sense of group membership receives strong support in the group-based emotion domain, and discuss the implications of our results for understanding the role of identification in these studies.

Group Processes & Intergroup RelationsVol. 29(1)
University of the Pacific (US), Google (United States) (US), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), Sentient Science (United States) (US), Strategic Insight (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Cultural Differences and Values
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.