AI-Driven Heuristic Analysis: Enhancing Work Instruction With Generative Models

The study investigated the feasibility and reliability of using generative artificial intelligence to conduct heuristic evaluations of workplace instructions. A custom GPT model, fine-tuned with examples and heuristic criteria, was tasked with evaluating aerospace-based work instructions. The AI’s output included identifying weaknesses and improvements, heuristic scoring, and providing rationales for its decisions and analyses. Results showed poor agreement between the AI and human experts, but consistent and reproducible AI scoring. Agreement with human experts was low due to high variability among human evaluators, but qualitative analysis confirmed the AI’s ability to identify common weaknesses and offer relevant feedback, which outperformed individual human evaluators. Finally, although the AI provided adequate explanations, some explanations lacked detail. The research demonstrates the potential of AI-driven heuristic evaluations to streamline assessment processes and augment human analysis in high-risk industries, while acknowledging the need for ongoing model refinement and improved transparency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813251369802
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Driven Heuristic Analysis: Enhancing Work Instruction With Generative Models

Phuoc Thai, Fernando Montalvo, Promise Stephens, Zachary Bulger
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

AI-Driven Heuristic Analysis: Enhancing Work Instruction With Generative Models

Phuoc Thai, Fernando Montalvo, Promise Stephens, Zachary Bulger
article en

Abstract

The study investigated the feasibility and reliability of using generative artificial intelligence to conduct heuristic evaluations of workplace instructions. A custom GPT model, fine-tuned with examples and heuristic criteria, was tasked with evaluating aerospace-based work instructions. The AI’s output included identifying weaknesses and improvements, heuristic scoring, and providing rationales for its decisions and analyses. Results showed poor agreement between the AI and human experts, but consistent and reproducible AI scoring. Agreement with human experts was low due to high variability among human evaluators, but qualitative analysis confirmed the AI’s ability to identify common weaknesses and offer relevant feedback, which outperformed individual human evaluators. Finally, although the AI provided adequate explanations, some explanations lacked detail. The research demonstrates the potential of AI-driven heuristic evaluations to streamline assessment processes and augment human analysis in high-risk industries, while acknowledging the need for ongoing model refinement and improved transparency.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 69(1)
University of Central Florida (US), The Astronauts Memorial Foundation (US), PaneraTech (United States) (US), Eastern University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI-Driven Heuristic Analysis: Enhancing Work Instruction With Generative Models — Phuoc Thai, Fernando Montalvo, et al. · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS