Judicial Associations Across Europe: Balancing the Narrative

Abstract While in some countries judicial associations have long been objects of scholarly interest, the burgeoning debate over judicial independence in Europe and the growing interconnection between associations of different states have broadened the discussion beyond strictly domestic borders. The adoption of a specific opinion on judicial associations by the Consultative Council of European Judges on November 6, 2020 (No. 23/2020) is further evidence of the increasing transnational attention to the topic. To draft such an Opinion, questionnaires were submitted to Council of Europe (CoE) Member States. By analysing and classifying the replies of the CoE Member States, we first intend to offer a comprehensive assessment of the European experiences to highlight convergences and divergences. Secondly, we aim to juxtapose the representation of judicial associations as it emerges from the replies with the one debated in legal scholarship. To this end, we will try to understand the role of judicial associations in promoting and upholding judicial independence, with particular emphasis on the Italian Case.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hague Journal on the Rule of Law
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-025-00260-9
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Judicial Associations Across Europe: Balancing the Narrative

Daniela Cavallini, Silvio Roberto Vinceti, Eleonora Ferrari
Hague Journal on the Rule of Law
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

Judicial Associations Across Europe: Balancing the Narrative

Daniela Cavallini, Silvio Roberto Vinceti, Eleonora Ferrari
article en

Abstract

Abstract While in some countries judicial associations have long been objects of scholarly interest, the burgeoning debate over judicial independence in Europe and the growing interconnection between associations of different states have broadened the discussion beyond strictly domestic borders. The adoption of a specific opinion on judicial associations by the Consultative Council of European Judges on November 6, 2020 (No. 23/2020) is further evidence of the increasing transnational attention to the topic. To draft such an Opinion, questionnaires were submitted to Council of Europe (CoE) Member States. By analysing and classifying the replies of the CoE Member States, we first intend to offer a comprehensive assessment of the European experiences to highlight convergences and divergences. Secondly, we aim to juxtapose the representation of judicial associations as it emerges from the replies with the one debated in legal scholarship. To this end, we will try to understand the role of judicial associations in promoting and upholding judicial independence, with particular emphasis on the Italian Case.

Hague Journal on the Rule of Law
Poder Judicial de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires (AR), University of Bologna (IT)
Università di Bologna
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Judicial Associations Across Europe: Balancing the Narrative — Daniela Cavallini, Silvio Roberto Vinceti, et al. · Hague Journal on the Rule of Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS