The Influence of Structured Debate Method on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills and Understanding of Islamic Creed in the Study of Ahlusunnah wal Jamaah

The integration of the structured debate method in Islamic theology education remains underexplored, despite its potential to enhance students’ critical thinking and deepen their understanding of Islamic creed, particularly within the Ahlusunnah wal Jamaah (Aswaja) framework. This study aimed to examine the impact of the structured debate method on (1) students’ critical thinking skills and (2) their comprehension of Islamic creed (Aqidah) among second-semester students in the Islamic Education Management Program at STIT Palapa Nusantara. Utilizing a quantitative approach with a pre-experimental design (one-group pre-test and post-test), the study involved 35 purposively selected students. Data were gathered through structured questionnaires and analyzed using paired sample t-tests and correlation analysis. The findings indicate that the structured debate method significantly improved students’ critical thinking skills (p < 0.05) and positively influenced their understanding of the Aswaja creed. These results align with constructivist pedagogical theory, emphasizing the role of interactive learning in promoting cognitive engagement and theological internalization. The study contributes to the theoretical discourse in Islamic education and offers practical guidance for educators and institutions to incorporate structured debate as a strategy to enhance students’ intellectual and spiritual development. Further research is recommended to assess the long-term effects and broader applicability of this method across other areas of Islamic studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FONDATIA
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36088/fondatia.v9i3.5761
Primary Topic
Arabic Language Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of Structured Debate Method on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills and Understanding of Islamic Creed in the Study of Ahlusunnah wal Jamaah

Agus Gozali, M. Ali Karmani
FONDATIA
Arabic Language Education Studies
article

The Influence of Structured Debate Method on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills and Understanding of Islamic Creed in the Study of Ahlusunnah wal Jamaah

Agus Gozali, M. Ali Karmani
article en

Abstract

The integration of the structured debate method in Islamic theology education remains underexplored, despite its potential to enhance students’ critical thinking and deepen their understanding of Islamic creed, particularly within the Ahlusunnah wal Jamaah (Aswaja) framework. This study aimed to examine the impact of the structured debate method on (1) students’ critical thinking skills and (2) their comprehension of Islamic creed (Aqidah) among second-semester students in the Islamic Education Management Program at STIT Palapa Nusantara. Utilizing a quantitative approach with a pre-experimental design (one-group pre-test and post-test), the study involved 35 purposively selected students. Data were gathered through structured questionnaires and analyzed using paired sample t-tests and correlation analysis. The findings indicate that the structured debate method significantly improved students’ critical thinking skills (p < 0.05) and positively influenced their understanding of the Aswaja creed. These results align with constructivist pedagogical theory, emphasizing the role of interactive learning in promoting cognitive engagement and theological internalization. The study contributes to the theoretical discourse in Islamic education and offers practical guidance for educators and institutions to incorporate structured debate as a strategy to enhance students’ intellectual and spiritual development. Further research is recommended to assess the long-term effects and broader applicability of this method across other areas of Islamic studies.

FONDATIAVol. 9(3)
Universitas Prima Nusantara Bukittinggi (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Arabic Language Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Influence of Structured Debate Method on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills and Understanding of Islamic Creed in the Study of Ahlusunnah wal Jamaah — Agus Gozali, M. Ali Karmani · FONDATIA (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS