Stress Measurement in Office Workers—A Scoping Review

This scoping literature review addresses the research question of measuring stress: What methodologies and associated metrics are employed for the in-situ assessment of stress among knowledge workers? Lab and field studies of any qualitative, quantitative, or mixed design reported in English from 2000 to 15 October 2024 were retrieved from Compendex, PubMed, and Web of Science. The 17 included studies covered office workers in several countries; all included qualitative elements while a minority (6) included quantitative methods. Future research would benefit from the development of unobtrusive data collection methods and analysis of different types of stressors on office workers. The review also informs which methodologies and metrics might be applied to hybrid office workers, a subset of knowledge/office workers, in future studies on stress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813251369781
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stress Measurement in Office Workers—A Scoping Review

Mark Benden, Martha Parker, David I. Douphrate
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
article

Stress Measurement in Office Workers—A Scoping Review

Mark Benden, Martha Parker, David I. Douphrate
article en

Abstract

This scoping literature review addresses the research question of measuring stress: What methodologies and associated metrics are employed for the in-situ assessment of stress among knowledge workers? Lab and field studies of any qualitative, quantitative, or mixed design reported in English from 2000 to 15 October 2024 were retrieved from Compendex, PubMed, and Web of Science. The 17 included studies covered office workers in several countries; all included qualitative elements while a minority (6) included quantitative methods. Future research would benefit from the development of unobtrusive data collection methods and analysis of different types of stressors on office workers. The review also informs which methodologies and metrics might be applied to hybrid office workers, a subset of knowledge/office workers, in future studies on stress.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 69(1)
Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Stress Measurement in Office Workers—A Scoping Review — Mark Benden, Martha Parker, et al. · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS