Variability of esophageal food impaction management across pediatric specialties

Esophageal food impaction (EFI) requires urgent endoscopy, typically performed by pediatric gastroenterologists (GI) or pediatric surgeons. We investigated differences in the approach between GI and surgeons to EFIs at a single pediatric center. Data collected included demographics, method of removal, whether esophageal biopsies were obtained, and biopsy results. These data were used to compare the approach to EFIs between GI and surgeons. There were 101 cases of EFI, intervened on by GI (<i>n</i> = 78) and surgery (<i>n</i> = 23). GI more frequently performed endoscopic extraction compared with surgery (41% vs. 13%, <i>p</i> = 0.007). GI obtained biopsies more frequently than surgery (92% vs. 13%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). GI and surgeons have different approaches to management and intervention for EFI. GI are more likely to remove the EFI by extraction as well as take biopsies at the time of the endoscopy compared to pediatric surgeons. These practice differences have clinical implications for the long-term management of these patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JPGN Reports
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jpr3.70081
Primary Topic
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variability of esophageal food impaction management across pediatric specialties

Mariah Eisner, Evan S. Dellon, Sabine Eid, Raul E. Sanchez et al.
JPGN Reports
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
article

Variability of esophageal food impaction management across pediatric specialties

Mariah Eisner, Evan S. Dellon, Sabine Eid, Raul E. Sanchez, John Russo, Rajitha Devadoss Venkatesh, Brendan Boyle, Elizabeth A. Erwin, Julie Luna‐Torres
article en

Abstract

Esophageal food impaction (EFI) requires urgent endoscopy, typically performed by pediatric gastroenterologists (GI) or pediatric surgeons. We investigated differences in the approach between GI and surgeons to EFIs at a single pediatric center. Data collected included demographics, method of removal, whether esophageal biopsies were obtained, and biopsy results. These data were used to compare the approach to EFIs between GI and surgeons. There were 101 cases of EFI, intervened on by GI (<i>n</i> = 78) and surgery (<i>n</i> = 23). GI more frequently performed endoscopic extraction compared with surgery (41% vs. 13%, <i>p</i> = 0.007). GI obtained biopsies more frequently than surgery (92% vs. 13%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). GI and surgeons have different approaches to management and intervention for EFI. GI are more likely to remove the EFI by extraction as well as take biopsies at the time of the endoscopy compared to pediatric surgeons. These practice differences have clinical implications for the long-term management of these patients.

JPGN ReportsVol. 6(4)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Nationwide Children's Hospital (US), Children's Hospital Colorado (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Variability of esophageal food impaction management across pediatric specialties — Mariah Eisner, Evan S. Dellon, et al. · JPGN Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS