Long‐term monitoring of Indiana bats on the Fort Knox military base in Kentucky

Abstract Military installations are important refuges for sensitive species and are charged with conducting conservation measures for species’ habitat protection. The federally endangered Indiana bat Myotis sodalis was first documented at Fort Knox in northcentral Kentucky in 1998. We monitored this first documented colony and additional colonies on base from 2005–2021. By conducting multiple simultaneous emergence counts and banding bats at both natural and artificial roosts (e.g., BrandenBark®), we documented the two largest Indiana bat maternity colonies in the range of the species and two additional colonies that require additional study. An average of 102.5 ± 5.2 bats emerged per roost during 449 counts of 104 roosts. Emergence counts from BrandenBark® ( = 122.7 ± 8.0 bats per roost) were significantly greater than those from natural roosts ( = 71.6 ± 9.3 bats per roost), and 16 emergence events exceeded the published maximum emergence count of 384 bats. We tracked bats to 190 natural and artificial roosts. Most of the 158 natural roosts were green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica or silver maple Acer saccharinum trees. There were no significant differences in roost tree diameter at breast height (dbh) or height compared to the dbh and height of trees in the plot around the roost, and there were no differences in roost dbh or height among reproductive periods. Home range sizes between the two main colonies were similar: 5,003.8 ha at the Cundiff Lake colony and 4,501.8 ha at the HA6 colony. We found that federal bounding dates for reproductive periods did not align with actual dates of reproduction at Fort Knox for pregnancy or post‐lactation, but there was no difference for the lactation period. The contiguous managed deciduous forest, abundant water sources, and proximity to large hibernacula make the roosting and foraging habitat at Fort Knox ideal for supporting large colonies of bats.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wildlife Management
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.70097
Primary Topic
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long‐term monitoring of Indiana bats on the Fort Knox military base in Kentucky

Piper L. Roby, Mark W. Gumbert, Michael Brandenburg, Michael P. Armstrong et al.
Journal of Wildlife Management
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
article

Long‐term monitoring of Indiana bats on the Fort Knox military base in Kentucky

Piper L. Roby, Mark W. Gumbert, Michael Brandenburg, Michael P. Armstrong, William R. Seiter
article en

Abstract

Abstract Military installations are important refuges for sensitive species and are charged with conducting conservation measures for species’ habitat protection. The federally endangered Indiana bat Myotis sodalis was first documented at Fort Knox in northcentral Kentucky in 1998. We monitored this first documented colony and additional colonies on base from 2005–2021. By conducting multiple simultaneous emergence counts and banding bats at both natural and artificial roosts (e.g., BrandenBark®), we documented the two largest Indiana bat maternity colonies in the range of the species and two additional colonies that require additional study. An average of 102.5 ± 5.2 bats emerged per roost during 449 counts of 104 roosts. Emergence counts from BrandenBark® ( = 122.7 ± 8.0 bats per roost) were significantly greater than those from natural roosts ( = 71.6 ± 9.3 bats per roost), and 16 emergence events exceeded the published maximum emergence count of 384 bats. We tracked bats to 190 natural and artificial roosts. Most of the 158 natural roosts were green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica or silver maple Acer saccharinum trees. There were no significant differences in roost tree diameter at breast height (dbh) or height compared to the dbh and height of trees in the plot around the roost, and there were no differences in roost dbh or height among reproductive periods. Home range sizes between the two main colonies were similar: 5,003.8 ha at the Cundiff Lake colony and 4,501.8 ha at the HA6 colony. We found that federal bounding dates for reproductive periods did not align with actual dates of reproduction at Fort Knox for pregnancy or post‐lactation, but there was no difference for the lactation period. The contiguous managed deciduous forest, abundant water sources, and proximity to large hibernacula make the roosting and foraging habitat at Fort Knox ideal for supporting large colonies of bats.

Journal of Wildlife ManagementVol. 89(8)
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), Ireland Army Community Hospital (US), Jiangxi Copper (China) (CN)
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Army
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.