Conservation genetics of two imperiled map turtle species: The Pascagoula map turtle and Pearl River map turtle

Abstract The Pascagoula map turtle Graptemys gibbonsi and the Pearl River map turtle G. pearlensis are endemic to their respective river drainages, the Pascagoula River and Pearl River. Both species are considered imperiled, with anthropogenic activities (e.g., impoundments, pollution) differentially impacting these river systems and their respective species. Genetic assessments have already been completed for the sympatric, federally threatened yellow‐blotched sawback G. flavimaculata of the Pascagoula River and ringed sawback G. oculifera of the Pearl River, pursuant to the Endangered Species Act; however, the megacephalic Pascagoula map turtle and Pearl River map turtle occupy different ecological niches and may show different patterns of genetic structure than the microcephalic sawbacks. We used up to 11 microsatellite loci to analyze the population genetic structure and effective population size of the Pascagoula map turtle and Pearl River map turtle sampled throughout their ranges. For the Pascagoula map turtle, the STRUCTURE results indicated two well‐supported groups (Upper Leaf River and Upper Chickasawhay River) and a third moderately supported group (Pascagoula River). However, the Pearl River map turtle lacked strong genetic structure throughout the Pearl River system. Although a single genetic population was recovered for the Pearl River map turtle, it is not entirely panmictic, as there were private alleles at some sites and evidence of isolation by distance. The genetic structure of both species mirrors the findings of the sympatric yellow‐blotched map turtle and ringed map turtle, possibly reflecting the influence of their respective river drainage's hydrological histories or dendritic structure. Our study provides the first genetic assessment for the Pascagoula map turtle and Pearl River map turtle, which can be used to inform potential reintroduction needs in the future and inform management plans to maintain current levels of genetic diversity and connectivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wildlife Management
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.70091
Primary Topic
Turtle Biology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conservation genetics of two imperiled map turtle species: The Pascagoula map turtle and Pearl River map turtle

Peter V. Lindeman, Will Selman, Luke Pearson, Robert L. Jones et al.
Journal of Wildlife Management
Turtle Biology and Conservation
article

Conservation genetics of two imperiled map turtle species: The Pascagoula map turtle and Pearl River map turtle

Peter V. Lindeman, Will Selman, Luke Pearson, Robert L. Jones, Brian R. Kreiser
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Pascagoula map turtle Graptemys gibbonsi and the Pearl River map turtle G. pearlensis are endemic to their respective river drainages, the Pascagoula River and Pearl River. Both species are considered imperiled, with anthropogenic activities (e.g., impoundments, pollution) differentially impacting these river systems and their respective species. Genetic assessments have already been completed for the sympatric, federally threatened yellow‐blotched sawback G. flavimaculata of the Pascagoula River and ringed sawback G. oculifera of the Pearl River, pursuant to the Endangered Species Act; however, the megacephalic Pascagoula map turtle and Pearl River map turtle occupy different ecological niches and may show different patterns of genetic structure than the microcephalic sawbacks. We used up to 11 microsatellite loci to analyze the population genetic structure and effective population size of the Pascagoula map turtle and Pearl River map turtle sampled throughout their ranges. For the Pascagoula map turtle, the STRUCTURE results indicated two well‐supported groups (Upper Leaf River and Upper Chickasawhay River) and a third moderately supported group (Pascagoula River). However, the Pearl River map turtle lacked strong genetic structure throughout the Pearl River system. Although a single genetic population was recovered for the Pearl River map turtle, it is not entirely panmictic, as there were private alleles at some sites and evidence of isolation by distance. The genetic structure of both species mirrors the findings of the sympatric yellow‐blotched map turtle and ringed map turtle, possibly reflecting the influence of their respective river drainage's hydrological histories or dendritic structure. Our study provides the first genetic assessment for the Pascagoula map turtle and Pearl River map turtle, which can be used to inform potential reintroduction needs in the future and inform management plans to maintain current levels of genetic diversity and connectivity.

Journal of Wildlife ManagementVol. 89(8)
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), Edinboro University (US), Millsaps College (US), Mississippi Museum of Natural Science (US), University of Southern Mississippi (US)
Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks, Batchelor Foundation, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Turtle Biology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.