Application of lidar and camera traps to model wildlife habitat

Abstract Many wildlife studies develop habitat models based on spatially limited, ground‐based surveys. These surveys cannot adequately measure forest canopy features or characterize features at landscape scales, nor can these models be applied at larger extents, making them less useful for conservation. Lidar offers the opportunity to objectively measure habitat features across landscape‐level extents, making it possible to predict landscape suitability at the level of entire states. We measured structural diversity of forest vegetation at 179 plots across Indiana, USA, at 3 radii (50 m, 100 m, and 300 m) to explore species associations with forest characteristics at different spatial scales. We developed occupancy models at each scale to predict species presence by relating detection–non‐detection of wildlife species from camera traps (2019–2020) to indices of forest structure derived from aerial lidar (2016–2020). We quantified the relationship between the presence of 7 wildlife species and the 3 forest structure metrics. The effect sizes for each metric varied depending on the plot extent and species, often displaying opposite trends at different radii. Deep gap fraction had a strong positive association with species like eastern cottontail ( Sylvilagus floridanus ) at the 100‐m and 300‐m extents (95% credible intervals did not cross zero), but weaker relationships at 50 m. Some species also used areas with higher vegetation diversity, such as coyote ( Canis latrans ), which was positively associated with higher values for Gini foliage diversity at the 300‐m extents. Habitat generalists did not show strong evidence of selection for specific metrics. Our study demonstrates that lidar shows great promise for habitat modeling based on its ability to characterize forest structure at landscape scales across large geographic extents. These models identify patterns of space use that are difficult and expensive to capture through traditional survey methods and have clear conservation and management applications owing to their extensive spatial coverage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wildlife Management
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.70093
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of lidar and camera traps to model wildlife habitat

Elizabeth A. Flaherty, Songlin Fei, Jinha Jung, Robert K. Swihart et al.
Journal of Wildlife Management
Species Distribution and Climate Change
article

Application of lidar and camera traps to model wildlife habitat

Elizabeth A. Flaherty, Songlin Fei, Jinha Jung, Robert K. Swihart, Jessica Elliott
article en

Abstract

Abstract Many wildlife studies develop habitat models based on spatially limited, ground‐based surveys. These surveys cannot adequately measure forest canopy features or characterize features at landscape scales, nor can these models be applied at larger extents, making them less useful for conservation. Lidar offers the opportunity to objectively measure habitat features across landscape‐level extents, making it possible to predict landscape suitability at the level of entire states. We measured structural diversity of forest vegetation at 179 plots across Indiana, USA, at 3 radii (50 m, 100 m, and 300 m) to explore species associations with forest characteristics at different spatial scales. We developed occupancy models at each scale to predict species presence by relating detection–non‐detection of wildlife species from camera traps (2019–2020) to indices of forest structure derived from aerial lidar (2016–2020). We quantified the relationship between the presence of 7 wildlife species and the 3 forest structure metrics. The effect sizes for each metric varied depending on the plot extent and species, often displaying opposite trends at different radii. Deep gap fraction had a strong positive association with species like eastern cottontail ( Sylvilagus floridanus ) at the 100‐m and 300‐m extents (95% credible intervals did not cross zero), but weaker relationships at 50 m. Some species also used areas with higher vegetation diversity, such as coyote ( Canis latrans ), which was positively associated with higher values for Gini foliage diversity at the 300‐m extents. Habitat generalists did not show strong evidence of selection for specific metrics. Our study demonstrates that lidar shows great promise for habitat modeling based on its ability to characterize forest structure at landscape scales across large geographic extents. These models identify patterns of space use that are difficult and expensive to capture through traditional survey methods and have clear conservation and management applications owing to their extensive spatial coverage.

Journal of Wildlife ManagementVol. 89(8)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Purdue University, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.