Measurement Quality of a Multi-item Scale in Plain Language

To ensure good measurement quality, survey questions should be clear, concise, and easily understandable for all respondents. One way of achieving this is to use plain language, an approach comprising a set of measures relating to the wording, sentence structure, and design of texts. Using a between-subjects design in a web survey, we tested whether a multi-item scale in plain language leads to better measurement quality while having similar scale properties to the original, standard language scale. Our results showed that the plain-language version led to greater response differentiation, fewer midpoint responses, and shorter response times than the original version, and that the two language versions had similar scale properties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Field Methods
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x251322031
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measurement Quality of a Multi-item Scale in Plain Language

Cornelia Neuert, Tobias Gummer, Tanja Kunz
Field Methods
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Measurement Quality of a Multi-item Scale in Plain Language

Cornelia Neuert, Tobias Gummer, Tanja Kunz
article en

Abstract

To ensure good measurement quality, survey questions should be clear, concise, and easily understandable for all respondents. One way of achieving this is to use plain language, an approach comprising a set of measures relating to the wording, sentence structure, and design of texts. Using a between-subjects design in a web survey, we tested whether a multi-item scale in plain language leads to better measurement quality while having similar scale properties to the original, standard language scale. Our results showed that the plain-language version led to greater response differentiation, fewer midpoint responses, and shorter response times than the original version, and that the two language versions had similar scale properties.

Field MethodsVol. 38(1)
University of Mannheim (DE), GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.