A Formal Theory of Mood Instability

Despite empirical progress, theoretical understanding of mood instability remains stagnant. A major reason for this stagnation concerns the field’s reliance on narrative theories that cannot integrate disparate quantitative perspectives on mood dynamics. Here, we address the limitations of narrative theorizing by developing a formal theory of mood instability. Our theory is predicated on the computational process of “evaluation”: the process of appraising the value of stimuli, which has long been theorized to be central to mood dynamics. Building on reinforcement-learning models of evaluation, we propose a dynamic framework, which we use to simulate various evaluative situations. Our simulations can generate and thereby formally integrate three well-known types of mood instability: emotional rigidity/inertia, transience/instability, and sensitivity/reactivity. We discuss how this formal perspective could enhance the theory, clinical utility, and measurement of mood instability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026251363862
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Formal Theory of Mood Instability

Richard P. Bentall, Peter Fonagy, Orestis Zavlis, Francesco Rigoli
Clinical Psychological Science
Mental Health Research Topics
article

A Formal Theory of Mood Instability

Richard P. Bentall, Peter Fonagy, Orestis Zavlis, Francesco Rigoli
article en

Abstract

Despite empirical progress, theoretical understanding of mood instability remains stagnant. A major reason for this stagnation concerns the field’s reliance on narrative theories that cannot integrate disparate quantitative perspectives on mood dynamics. Here, we address the limitations of narrative theorizing by developing a formal theory of mood instability. Our theory is predicated on the computational process of “evaluation”: the process of appraising the value of stimuli, which has long been theorized to be central to mood dynamics. Building on reinforcement-learning models of evaluation, we propose a dynamic framework, which we use to simulate various evaluative situations. Our simulations can generate and thereby formally integrate three well-known types of mood instability: emotional rigidity/inertia, transience/instability, and sensitivity/reactivity. We discuss how this formal perspective could enhance the theory, clinical utility, and measurement of mood instability.

Clinical Psychological Science
City, University of London (GB), Language Science (South Korea) (KR), University College London (GB), Hologic (Germany) (DE), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.