Determinants of forearm bone mineral density in male athletes with different osteogenic index of training

Physical activity appears to be a strong determinant of the building of peak bone mass and the degree of bone mineralization in young adult males. This study aimed to describe the impact of volleyball (V), throwing athletes (TA), climbing (CL), snowboarding participation (SN), fracture history, hand grip strength (HGS), and body composition on forearm bone mineral density (BMD) in males. BMD, bone mass content (BMC), and T-score of the distal (dis) and proximal (prox) parts of the forearm were measured by the DXA technique. The CL and TA groups showed the highest BMD, BMC, and T-score dis and prox. In the TA group, a higher prevalence of normal BMD was found in the distal part of the forearm compared to V (by 6.7%), CL (by 15.4%), and SN (by 35.7%). In the CL group a higher prevalence of normal BMD was found in the proximal part of the forearm compared to V (by 12.4%), TA (by 6.8%), and SN (by 34.6%). The highest prevalence of low bone density was observed in the SN group. Covariance analysis revealed that body height and the type of sports competition significantly affected BMD in the distal region (adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.77). For BMD in the proximal region, the significant factor was sports competition (adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.73). In both the distal and proximal regions of the BMC, the significant factors were handgrip strength (HGS) in newtons (N) and the type of sports competition (distal adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.60; proximal adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.85). Similar results were obtained for the T-score dis. The T-score prox was significantly affected only by HGS (N) (adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.59). Training based on throwing and weight-bearing exercises influences higher forearm BMD. The results of the study also highlight the important role of information about past fractures, which may serve as an initial indicator of risk groups for low bone density.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14474-2
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determinants of forearm bone mineral density in male athletes with different osteogenic index of training

Anna Kopiczko, Jakub Bałdyka
Scientific Reports
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

Determinants of forearm bone mineral density in male athletes with different osteogenic index of training

Anna Kopiczko, Jakub Bałdyka
article en

Abstract

Physical activity appears to be a strong determinant of the building of peak bone mass and the degree of bone mineralization in young adult males. This study aimed to describe the impact of volleyball (V), throwing athletes (TA), climbing (CL), snowboarding participation (SN), fracture history, hand grip strength (HGS), and body composition on forearm bone mineral density (BMD) in males. BMD, bone mass content (BMC), and T-score of the distal (dis) and proximal (prox) parts of the forearm were measured by the DXA technique. The CL and TA groups showed the highest BMD, BMC, and T-score dis and prox. In the TA group, a higher prevalence of normal BMD was found in the distal part of the forearm compared to V (by 6.7%), CL (by 15.4%), and SN (by 35.7%). In the CL group a higher prevalence of normal BMD was found in the proximal part of the forearm compared to V (by 12.4%), TA (by 6.8%), and SN (by 34.6%). The highest prevalence of low bone density was observed in the SN group. Covariance analysis revealed that body height and the type of sports competition significantly affected BMD in the distal region (adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.77). For BMD in the proximal region, the significant factor was sports competition (adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.73). In both the distal and proximal regions of the BMC, the significant factors were handgrip strength (HGS) in newtons (N) and the type of sports competition (distal adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.60; proximal adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.85). Similar results were obtained for the T-score dis. The T-score prox was significantly affected only by HGS (N) (adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.59). Training based on throwing and weight-bearing exercises influences higher forearm BMD. The results of the study also highlight the important role of information about past fractures, which may serve as an initial indicator of risk groups for low bone density.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.