On the classification of geological and industrial types of magnesite deposits

Subject study . Classification of industrial types of magnesite deposits. Aim . To detail the existing classification of magnesite deposits based on a set of defining features. Materials and methods . Materials – a set of lithological-facies, structuralmineralogical and isotope-geochemical features of magnesite deposits. Method – analysis of both our own and literary data for the classification of industrial types and clarification of their genesis. Results . The author’s genetic classification of industrial magnesite deposits is given in accordance with the principles of “specific classiology” and the allocation of taxonomic (crystalline structure, shape of ore bodies) and descriptive features of deposits. Two groups of magnesites are distinguished: A – clear-crystalline in pre-Mesozoic sequences and B – cryptocrystalline in Mesozoic-Cenozoic sequences. Within group A, there are sheet-like deposits of crystalline magnesites (A-2) in carbonate strata and lenses of talcbreunnerite stones among hyperbasites (A-3). Both types have signs of hydrothermal-metasomatic formation. This group includes layers of micritic magnesites associated with subaerial coastal-marine conditions and microbial-diagenetic stages of carbonate accumulation (A-1). The second group includes types associated with the weathering crust of hyperbasites: infiltration-residual stockwork (B-1), sheet clastochemogenic (B-2) and biochemogenic sedimentary-diagenetic (B-3). The distribution of stable isotopes forms non-overlapping areas with reduced δ 18 O values in the group of crystalline magnesites and a maximum in micritic and even higher values for the group of cryptocrystalline. Conclusions. The fundamental difference between the identified groups of magnesite deposits lies in the source of Mg: from seawater (types A-1 and A-2) or from hyperbasites (types A-3, Б-1, Б-2 и Б-3).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
LITHOSPHERE (Russia)
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24930/1681-9004-2025-25-4-794-818
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the classification of geological and industrial types of magnesite deposits

М. Т. Крупенин
LITHOSPHERE (Russia)
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

On the classification of geological and industrial types of magnesite deposits

М. Т. Крупенин
article en

Abstract

Subject study . Classification of industrial types of magnesite deposits. Aim . To detail the existing classification of magnesite deposits based on a set of defining features. Materials and methods . Materials – a set of lithological-facies, structuralmineralogical and isotope-geochemical features of magnesite deposits. Method – analysis of both our own and literary data for the classification of industrial types and clarification of their genesis. Results . The author’s genetic classification of industrial magnesite deposits is given in accordance with the principles of “specific classiology” and the allocation of taxonomic (crystalline structure, shape of ore bodies) and descriptive features of deposits. Two groups of magnesites are distinguished: A – clear-crystalline in pre-Mesozoic sequences and B – cryptocrystalline in Mesozoic-Cenozoic sequences. Within group A, there are sheet-like deposits of crystalline magnesites (A-2) in carbonate strata and lenses of talcbreunnerite stones among hyperbasites (A-3). Both types have signs of hydrothermal-metasomatic formation. This group includes layers of micritic magnesites associated with subaerial coastal-marine conditions and microbial-diagenetic stages of carbonate accumulation (A-1). The second group includes types associated with the weathering crust of hyperbasites: infiltration-residual stockwork (B-1), sheet clastochemogenic (B-2) and biochemogenic sedimentary-diagenetic (B-3). The distribution of stable isotopes forms non-overlapping areas with reduced δ 18 O values in the group of crystalline magnesites and a maximum in micritic and even higher values for the group of cryptocrystalline. Conclusions. The fundamental difference between the identified groups of magnesite deposits lies in the source of Mg: from seawater (types A-1 and A-2) or from hyperbasites (types A-3, Б-1, Б-2 и Б-3).

LITHOSPHERE (Russia)Vol. 25(4)
Zavaritsky Institute of Geology and Geochemistry (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.