Evaluation of the ABCG2 charge model in protein–ligand binding affinity calculations

Accurate binding free energy prediction is vital for drug design, motivating the assessment of new force field models. Here, we evaluate the ABCG2 charge model with nonequilibrium alchemical free energy simulations. GAFF2/ABCG2 achieves higher hydration free energy accuracy, but does not outperform GAFF2/AM1-BCC for protein–ligand binding free energy. Both charge models show comparable accuracy and compound ranking across targets, highlighting that optimizing a force field for a particular molecular property does not necessarily lead to better performance in other, even closely related, properties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemRxiv
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-j8bgp
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the ABCG2 charge model in protein–ligand binding affinity calculations

Vytautas Gapsys, Sudarshan Behera, Bert L. de Groot
1 citations
ChemRxiv
Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
1.05
article

Evaluation of the ABCG2 charge model in protein–ligand binding affinity calculations

Vytautas Gapsys, Sudarshan Behera, Bert L. de Groot
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Accurate binding free energy prediction is vital for drug design, motivating the assessment of new force field models. Here, we evaluate the ABCG2 charge model with nonequilibrium alchemical free energy simulations. GAFF2/ABCG2 achieves higher hydration free energy accuracy, but does not outperform GAFF2/AM1-BCC for protein–ligand binding free energy. Both charge models show comparable accuracy and compound ranking across targets, highlighting that optimizing a force field for a particular molecular property does not necessarily lead to better performance in other, even closely related, properties.

ChemRxiv
Janssen (Belgium) (BE), Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization (DE), Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of the ABCG2 charge model in protein–ligand binding affinity calculations — Vytautas Gapsys, Sudarshan Behera, et al. · ChemRxiv (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS