Quantitative Evaluation of the Veteran Crisis Line Lethal Means Safety Pilot

<b></b> <i>Background:</i> The Veteran Crisis Line (VCL) Lethal Means Safety (LMS) Pilot offered cable gun locks or medication take-back envelopes to veteran callers at risk of suicide. <i>Aims:</i> We aimed to assess the acceptability of offering LMS interventions to these veterans and examined call outcomes, health care use, and mortality of veterans associated with acceptance of the intervention. <i>Method:</i> We assessed the acceptability of offering LMS interventions to eligible veterans who contacted the VCL between June 13, 2022, and March 31, 2023. To examine outcomes associated with acceptance of the intervention, we used inverse probability of treatment weights to balance veteran characteristics. <i>Results:</i> We found that 41.6% of veterans who were identified VHA enrollees accepted the intervention after being offered one, three times the rate of nonidentifiable veterans. Additionally, veterans who were offered any intervention, whether they accepted it or not, had a lower risk of having an emergency dispatch than those not offered one. <i>Limitations:</i> Veterans were not randomized to the intervention, so no causal inferences can be made. <i>Conclusions:</i> Our evaluation suggests that LMS interventions are acceptable to at-risk veterans. Further evaluation is needed to determine whether acceptance of an intervention has any long-term impacts on veteran outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crisis
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a001025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Evaluation of the Veteran Crisis Line Lethal Means Safety Pilot

Matthew C. Podlogar, MaryGrace Lauver, Yi-Jung Shen, Melissa M. Garrido et al.
1 citations
Crisis
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
2.17
article

Quantitative Evaluation of the Veteran Crisis Line Lethal Means Safety Pilot

Matthew C. Podlogar, MaryGrace Lauver, Yi-Jung Shen, Melissa M. Garrido, Izabela Sadej, Jolie E. Bourgeois, Yufei Li, Elizabeth Schaper
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b></b> <i>Background:</i> The Veteran Crisis Line (VCL) Lethal Means Safety (LMS) Pilot offered cable gun locks or medication take-back envelopes to veteran callers at risk of suicide. <i>Aims:</i> We aimed to assess the acceptability of offering LMS interventions to these veterans and examined call outcomes, health care use, and mortality of veterans associated with acceptance of the intervention. <i>Method:</i> We assessed the acceptability of offering LMS interventions to eligible veterans who contacted the VCL between June 13, 2022, and March 31, 2023. To examine outcomes associated with acceptance of the intervention, we used inverse probability of treatment weights to balance veteran characteristics. <i>Results:</i> We found that 41.6% of veterans who were identified VHA enrollees accepted the intervention after being offered one, three times the rate of nonidentifiable veterans. Additionally, veterans who were offered any intervention, whether they accepted it or not, had a lower risk of having an emergency dispatch than those not offered one. <i>Limitations:</i> Veterans were not randomized to the intervention, so no causal inferences can be made. <i>Conclusions:</i> Our evaluation suggests that LMS interventions are acceptable to at-risk veterans. Further evaluation is needed to determine whether acceptance of an intervention has any long-term impacts on veteran outcomes.

CrisisVol. 46(6)
Boston University (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US), VA Boston Healthcare System (US), Department of Veterans Affairs (AU), Mass General Brigham (US)
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
2.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.