Separating Singapore from British India

Abstract Since the founding of Singapore, two conflicting ideologies concerning this port city emerged. On one hand, the British East India Company insisted that Singapore should serve primarily as a transit port for its trade with China, with minimal government investment. They established transit infrastructures such as lighthouses and docks, not only to facilitate trade between India and China but also to generate revenue by trade taxes for the company. On the other hand, the Straits merchants based in Singapore, who conducted their business in Southeast Asia, advocated a free port policy. They vehemently opposed any form of taxation and government interference. In their resistance to the Raj's taxation on the transit infrastructures in Singapore, the Straits merchants positioned themselves as proponents of liberal and enlightened economic policies while also constructing an identity for the Raj as despotic, corrupt, and oriental in nature. This cultural construction against the Raj provided the Straits merchants with the legitimacy to advocate for Singapore's separation from British India in the 1860s.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Asian Studies
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/00219118-11904379
Primary Topic
Socioeconomic Development in Asia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Separating Singapore from British India

Yin Cao
The Journal of Asian Studies
Socioeconomic Development in Asia
article

Separating Singapore from British India

Yin Cao
article en

Abstract

Abstract Since the founding of Singapore, two conflicting ideologies concerning this port city emerged. On one hand, the British East India Company insisted that Singapore should serve primarily as a transit port for its trade with China, with minimal government investment. They established transit infrastructures such as lighthouses and docks, not only to facilitate trade between India and China but also to generate revenue by trade taxes for the company. On the other hand, the Straits merchants based in Singapore, who conducted their business in Southeast Asia, advocated a free port policy. They vehemently opposed any form of taxation and government interference. In their resistance to the Raj's taxation on the transit infrastructures in Singapore, the Straits merchants positioned themselves as proponents of liberal and enlightened economic policies while also constructing an identity for the Raj as despotic, corrupt, and oriental in nature. This cultural construction against the Raj provided the Straits merchants with the legitimacy to advocate for Singapore's separation from British India in the 1860s.

The Journal of Asian StudiesVol. 84(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Socioeconomic Development in Asia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Separating Singapore from British India — Yin Cao · The Journal of Asian Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS