The Restoration of Mediaeval Churches in the Baroque Era

The term “restoration” was first used in connection with constructions in Rome, in the 16th century. Much later, the discipline we now call “Historic Building Restoration” was formed. Today, there is a noticeable concern for modifying the terminology to adapt to the evolution of the discipline. Indeed, since the end of the 19th century, when the discipline became independent in various countries, a certain terminology has been established: restoration, conservation, protection, etc., even though as early as 1883 Camillo BOITO had resolved the difference between restoration and conservation. The adoption of terms that exist in all languages with the same meaning was based on national sensitivities that wanted to highlight a certain direction. The evolution of the discipline in the 20th century makes the debate over terminology today pointless. Changes in terminology are often seen in different countries, such as how the name of the “course” in the school curriculum changes frequently. However, comparing analytical programs shows that these courses are identical. The changes in terminology only show a concern to keep up with the evolution of the discipline. In Romania, the discipline adopted French terminology at the end of the 19th century. This terminology is still used today, including in legislation, even though it is clear that it no longer reflects reality.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Transsylvania Nostra Journal
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64311/tnj.2023.1.04
Primary Topic
Historical and Religious Studies of Rome
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Restoration of Mediaeval Churches in the Baroque Era

Virgil Pop
Transsylvania Nostra Journal
Historical and Religious Studies of Rome
article

The Restoration of Mediaeval Churches in the Baroque Era

Virgil Pop
article en

Abstract

The term “restoration” was first used in connection with constructions in Rome, in the 16th century. Much later, the discipline we now call “Historic Building Restoration” was formed. Today, there is a noticeable concern for modifying the terminology to adapt to the evolution of the discipline. Indeed, since the end of the 19th century, when the discipline became independent in various countries, a certain terminology has been established: restoration, conservation, protection, etc., even though as early as 1883 Camillo BOITO had resolved the difference between restoration and conservation. The adoption of terms that exist in all languages with the same meaning was based on national sensitivities that wanted to highlight a certain direction. The evolution of the discipline in the 20th century makes the debate over terminology today pointless. Changes in terminology are often seen in different countries, such as how the name of the “course” in the school curriculum changes frequently. However, comparing analytical programs shows that these courses are identical. The changes in terminology only show a concern to keep up with the evolution of the discipline. In Romania, the discipline adopted French terminology at the end of the 19th century. This terminology is still used today, including in legislation, even though it is clear that it no longer reflects reality.

Transsylvania Nostra JournalVol. 2023(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Historical and Religious Studies of Rome
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.