Emission transfers, pollution havens, and environmental regulations

We develop a model incorporating monopolistic competition, intra-industry trade, international capital flows, and endogenous environmental policies to explore the pollution haven hypothesis and emission transfers. Firms’ mark-ups and prices depend on their spatial distribution, creating strategic incentives for countries to relax environmental policies to enhance capital returns. This can turn the country with a larger market size into a pollution haven. Even with stricter policies, the large country’s abundant endowments can make it the net importer of emissions, explaining the mixed empirical evidence for the pollution haven hypothesis. Our numerical analysis shows that capital mobility does not always weaken regulations, and that the pollution haven may be subjected to lower welfare. We also find that imposing tariffs raises emission taxes, thereby reducing global pollution. This contrasts with the consumption-based pollution case, where tariffs lower environmental taxes and may increase global pollution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Tax and Public Finance
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-025-09922-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emission transfers, pollution havens, and environmental regulations

Yu‐Bong Lai
1 citations
International Tax and Public Finance
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
3.13
article

Emission transfers, pollution havens, and environmental regulations

Yu‐Bong Lai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We develop a model incorporating monopolistic competition, intra-industry trade, international capital flows, and endogenous environmental policies to explore the pollution haven hypothesis and emission transfers. Firms’ mark-ups and prices depend on their spatial distribution, creating strategic incentives for countries to relax environmental policies to enhance capital returns. This can turn the country with a larger market size into a pollution haven. Even with stricter policies, the large country’s abundant endowments can make it the net importer of emissions, explaining the mixed empirical evidence for the pollution haven hypothesis. Our numerical analysis shows that capital mobility does not always weaken regulations, and that the pollution haven may be subjected to lower welfare. We also find that imposing tariffs raises emission taxes, thereby reducing global pollution. This contrasts with the consumption-based pollution case, where tariffs lower environmental taxes and may increase global pollution.

International Tax and Public Finance
National Chengchi University (TW)
National Chengchi University
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.