European Association of Endoscopic Surgery Clinical Practice Guideline Protocol: Evidence‐Informed Recommendations on the Management of Cholecystitis With ESAIC and ESR Participation

ABSTRACT Background Several options exist for the management of acute cholecystitis. However, practice patterns vary widely, and there is a need for high‐quality guidance in areas of controversy. Methods and Analysis We will develop a clinical practice guideline on the management of patients with Tokyo Grades I–III acute cholecystitis. The guideline will answer the following key questions: Should adult patients with Grades I or II acute cholecystitis receive conservative management or emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Should adult patients with Grades II or III acute cholecystitis receive percutaneous drainage or emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Should adult patients with Grades II or III acute cholecystitis receive conservative management or emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy > 72 h from symptom onset? Our systematic review group will undertake multiple systematic reviews to identify articles addressing each key question. Next, we will appraise the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. An international, expert multidisciplinary panel will then meet to review the evidence and develop recommendations using GRADE's evidence‐to‐decision framework. This panel will consist of four general surgeons, an interventional radiologist, an intensive care specialist, an anaesthetist, and two patient representatives. Panel members will finalize our recommendations by consensus at an in‐person meeting. This guideline will adhere to methodological standards according to GIN, GRADE and AGREE‐S. Ethics and Dissemination All participating members will declare their conflicts of interest, which will be addressed prior to guideline development. This clinical practice guideline will be presented at international scientific meetings, online presentations and social media, and published in full in the journal of Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Public Health Guidelines
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/gin2.70043
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

European Association of Endoscopic Surgery Clinical Practice Guideline Protocol: Evidence‐Informed Recommendations on the Management of Cholecystitis With ESAIC and ESR Participation

Gordon Guyatt, Salvador Morales‐Conde, Stavros A. Antoniou, Alexander Α. Tzanis et al.
Clinical and Public Health Guidelines
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

European Association of Endoscopic Surgery Clinical Practice Guideline Protocol: Evidence‐Informed Recommendations on the Management of Cholecystitis With ESAIC and ESR Participation

Gordon Guyatt, Salvador Morales‐Conde, Stavros A. Antoniou, Alexander Α. Tzanis, Bright Huo, Dimitris Mavridis, Alexandros‐Georgios Asimakopoulos, Carolina Soledad
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Several options exist for the management of acute cholecystitis. However, practice patterns vary widely, and there is a need for high‐quality guidance in areas of controversy. Methods and Analysis We will develop a clinical practice guideline on the management of patients with Tokyo Grades I–III acute cholecystitis. The guideline will answer the following key questions: Should adult patients with Grades I or II acute cholecystitis receive conservative management or emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Should adult patients with Grades II or III acute cholecystitis receive percutaneous drainage or emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Should adult patients with Grades II or III acute cholecystitis receive conservative management or emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy > 72 h from symptom onset? Our systematic review group will undertake multiple systematic reviews to identify articles addressing each key question. Next, we will appraise the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. An international, expert multidisciplinary panel will then meet to review the evidence and develop recommendations using GRADE's evidence‐to‐decision framework. This panel will consist of four general surgeons, an interventional radiologist, an intensive care specialist, an anaesthetist, and two patient representatives. Panel members will finalize our recommendations by consensus at an in‐person meeting. This guideline will adhere to methodological standards according to GIN, GRADE and AGREE‐S. Ethics and Dissemination All participating members will declare their conflicts of interest, which will be addressed prior to guideline development. This clinical practice guideline will be presented at international scientific meetings, online presentations and social media, and published in full in the journal of Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques .

Clinical and Public Health GuidelinesVol. 2(4)
Universitat de València (ES), University of Ioannina (GR), Hamilton General Hospital (CA), Valencia Catholic University Saint Vincent Martyr (ES), Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena (ES), Papageorgiou General Hospital (GR), Alexandra Hospital (GR), Hospital General Universitario De Valencia (ES), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.