Can reminder emails compel Americans to save? A two-million-person megastudy
In the United States, 24% of adults have no savings and 39% have less than a month of income saved. We present results from a megastudy where nearly 2 million customers of a US bank were randomly assigned to receive one of seven different 2-month email campaigns, each employing a different behavioral science insight to nudge one-time and recurring savings deposits and increase savings balances or to a control condition without such messages. These campaigns increased the probability of making a one-time savings deposit, on average, by 0.05 percentage points (a 0.51% increase over control). The best-performing campaign delivered weekly messages to customers that differed depending on recent savings behavior: messages to customers who had not made a savings account deposit in the last week included a simple reminder to save, while those to customers who had made a savings account deposit in the prior week were congratulated on this accomplishment. This top-performing campaign increased the monthly likelihood that a customer made a one-time savings deposit by 0.13 percentage points (a 1.32% increase). We estimate that rolling this 2-month campaign out to everyone in our megastudy population would have led to an extra $6,123,996 to $9,910,090 in savings. Together, our findings highlight that light-touch, frequent email nudges can cost-effectively create small increases in savings deposits in the United States. Ideally, to generate meaningful benefits, behavioral science insights would be incorporated into a wider range of communications and incentives designed by financial institutions.
Authors
- Youngwoo Jung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9621-6676)
- Avni Shah (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3810-2398)
- Rayyan S. Mobarak (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0452-965X)
- Shlomo Benartzi
- Sean F. Ellis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6099-0999)
- Matthew D. Hilchey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1998-847X)
- Heather N. Graci (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9220-729X)
- Katherine L. Milkman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9706-4830)
- Dena M. Gromet (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9153-7193)
- Dilip Soman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5998-4153)
- Laura Goodyear
- Angela Duckworth (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2644-3729)
- Christophe Van den Bulte (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9708-1596)
- Daniel Mochon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1734-0808)
- Jonathan Zinman
- Mitchell E. Simmons
- Nina Mažar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8248-654X)
- Dean Karlan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0164-1398)
- Ramon A. Silvera Zumaran (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1239-320X)
- Isabella M DeMay
Institutions
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Boston University (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Tulane University (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Scarborough Health Network (CA)
- Kellogg's (Canada) (CA)
- University of the Arts (US)
- Behavioral Tech Research, Inc. (US)
- Decision Sciences (United States) (US)
- Rothman Institute (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Anderson University - South Carolina (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PNAS Nexus
- Published
- 2025-08-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf280
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 12.51