Predicting natural variation in the yeast phenotypic landscape with machine learning

Most organismal traits result from the complex interplay of many genetic and environmental factors, making their prediction difficult. Here, we used machine learning (ML) models to explore phenotype predictions for 223 traits measured across 1011 genome-sequenced Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated worldwide. We benchmarked a ML pipeline with multiple linear and non-linear models to predict phenotypes from genotypes and gene expression, and determined gradient boosting machines as the best-performing model. Gene function disruption scores and gene presence/absence emerged as best predictors, suggesting a considerable contribution of the accessory genome in controlling phenotypes. The prediction accuracy broadly varied among phenotypes, with stress resistance being easier to predict compared to growth across nutrients. ML identified relevant genomic features linked to phenotypes, including high-impact variants with established relationships to phenotypes, despite these being rare in the population. Near-perfect accuracies were achieved when other phenomics data mostly in similar conditions were used, suggesting that useful information can be conveyed across phenotypes. Overall, our study underscores the power of ML to interpret the functional outcome of genetic variants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Systems Biology
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44320-025-00136-y
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Fungal and yeast genetics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting natural variation in the yeast phenotypic landscape with machine learning

Sakshi Khaiwal, Gianni Liti, Inigo Barrio‐Hernandez, Benjamin Barré et al.
3 citations
Molecular Systems Biology
Fungal and yeast genetics research
1.61
article

Predicting natural variation in the yeast phenotypic landscape with machine learning

Sakshi Khaiwal, Gianni Liti, Inigo Barrio‐Hernandez, Benjamin Barré, Pedro Beltrão, Jonas Warringer, Simon Stenberg, Matteo De Chiara
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Most organismal traits result from the complex interplay of many genetic and environmental factors, making their prediction difficult. Here, we used machine learning (ML) models to explore phenotype predictions for 223 traits measured across 1011 genome-sequenced Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated worldwide. We benchmarked a ML pipeline with multiple linear and non-linear models to predict phenotypes from genotypes and gene expression, and determined gradient boosting machines as the best-performing model. Gene function disruption scores and gene presence/absence emerged as best predictors, suggesting a considerable contribution of the accessory genome in controlling phenotypes. The prediction accuracy broadly varied among phenotypes, with stress resistance being easier to predict compared to growth across nutrients. ML identified relevant genomic features linked to phenotypes, including high-impact variants with established relationships to phenotypes, despite these being rare in the population. Near-perfect accuracies were achieved when other phenomics data mostly in similar conditions were used, suggesting that useful information can be conveyed across phenotypes. Overall, our study underscores the power of ML to interpret the functional outcome of genetic variants.

Molecular Systems BiologyVol. 21(11)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), ETH Zurich (CH), The Geneva Association (CH), Institut de Recherche sur le Cancer et le Vieillissement de Nice (FR), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale, Fondation Bettencourt Schueller, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Fungal and yeast genetics research
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.