Comparative study of advanced hydrogen liquefaction using triple cascade mixed refrigerant cycles with integrated energy exergy economic and environmental analysis

Hydrogen, as a clean energy source, is recognized as a pivotal energy carrier in the global transition to sustainable energy systems and serves as a crucial pathway for energy storage and efficient utilization within cryogenic systems. Hydrogen liquefaction is one of the most promising methods for increasing its energy density, enabling more efficient storage, transportation, and utilization in large-scale energy systems. However, substantial challenges persist, particularly regarding the high energy consumption associated with the liquefaction process. This study addresses these challenges by proposing two designs for a triple-cascade mixed refrigerant cycle aimed explicitly at reducing energy consumption for high-density hydrogen storage: 66.7 kg/m<sup>3</sup> at - 245 °C (Case 1) and 76 kg/m<sup>3</sup> at - 249 °C (Case 2). The proposed systems utilize two mixed refrigerant cycles for the precooling and cryogenic stages. In Case 1, pure nitrogen is employed as the third refrigerant in the precooling stage, whereas Case 2 incorporates a regenerative cryogenic hydrogen cycle as the third refrigerant throughout the entire system, coupled with a carbon dioxide cycle for compressor cooling. Simulations were conducted using Aspen HYSYS, with optimization through the Aspen Optimizer algorithm. The results indicate that Case 1 achieves a specific energy consumption (SEC) of 6.98 kWh/kgH₂, representing a 17.4% reduction from the baseline, while Case 2 reduces SEC to 6.19 kWh/kgH₂, a 14.5% decrease. The exergy analysis of the heat exchangers shows a 37% reduction in exergy destruction in Case 2 compared to Case 1. Additionally, Case 2 demonstrates a 5.8% reduction in capital expenditure and a 22% reduction in carbon footprint (CFP). These findings highlight the potential of the proposed triple-cascade process to enhance energy efficiency, improve both thermodynamic and economic performance, and reduce environmental impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14258-8
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study of advanced hydrogen liquefaction using triple cascade mixed refrigerant cycles with integrated energy exergy economic and environmental analysis

Mohamed Elhelw, Wael Mohamed El-Maghlany, Abd El‐Hamid Attia, M. Abd ElSalam ElSeuofy et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
1.06
article

Comparative study of advanced hydrogen liquefaction using triple cascade mixed refrigerant cycles with integrated energy exergy economic and environmental analysis

Mohamed Elhelw, Wael Mohamed El-Maghlany, Abd El‐Hamid Attia, M. Abd ElSalam ElSeuofy, M. Shawky Ismail
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Hydrogen, as a clean energy source, is recognized as a pivotal energy carrier in the global transition to sustainable energy systems and serves as a crucial pathway for energy storage and efficient utilization within cryogenic systems. Hydrogen liquefaction is one of the most promising methods for increasing its energy density, enabling more efficient storage, transportation, and utilization in large-scale energy systems. However, substantial challenges persist, particularly regarding the high energy consumption associated with the liquefaction process. This study addresses these challenges by proposing two designs for a triple-cascade mixed refrigerant cycle aimed explicitly at reducing energy consumption for high-density hydrogen storage: 66.7 kg/m<sup>3</sup> at - 245 °C (Case 1) and 76 kg/m<sup>3</sup> at - 249 °C (Case 2). The proposed systems utilize two mixed refrigerant cycles for the precooling and cryogenic stages. In Case 1, pure nitrogen is employed as the third refrigerant in the precooling stage, whereas Case 2 incorporates a regenerative cryogenic hydrogen cycle as the third refrigerant throughout the entire system, coupled with a carbon dioxide cycle for compressor cooling. Simulations were conducted using Aspen HYSYS, with optimization through the Aspen Optimizer algorithm. The results indicate that Case 1 achieves a specific energy consumption (SEC) of 6.98 kWh/kgH₂, representing a 17.4% reduction from the baseline, while Case 2 reduces SEC to 6.19 kWh/kgH₂, a 14.5% decrease. The exergy analysis of the heat exchangers shows a 37% reduction in exergy destruction in Case 2 compared to Case 1. Additionally, Case 2 demonstrates a 5.8% reduction in capital expenditure and a 22% reduction in carbon footprint (CFP). These findings highlight the potential of the proposed triple-cascade process to enhance energy efficiency, improve both thermodynamic and economic performance, and reduce environmental impact.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Alexandria University (EG)
Science and Technology Development Fund, Alexandria University
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
1.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.