The Many Lives of a Mughal King

Abstract This article presents a close reading of Aurangzēb ālamgīr par aik naẕar (1908), Shiblī Nuʿmānī’s (1857–1914) revisionist history of the Mughal emperor Aurangzeb, and its implications for thinking about secular politics in colonial India. At the cusp of the twentieth century, amid the rise of communal tensions, Aurangzeb found himself in the middle of public debates around India's national identity. Whereas upper-caste Hindu reformers and secular nationalists vilified Aurangzeb for his oppressive policies, Muslim reformers celebrated him for his efforts to bring India into conformity with a puritan brand of Islam. Intervening in the public and professional histories of the emperor, Nuʿmānī cast Aurangzeb as a “secular” ruler. Here the author attempts to analyze the variegated ways in which Nuʿmānī was thinking about pāltiks and the “secular” at a politically volatile moment in Indian history. In doing so the author attends to the effects that the imposition of Western secularism had on Nuʿmānī’s thought. Accordingly, the author analyzes how the processes of secularism in India transformed the ways in which its Muslim intellectuals were thinking about what it meant to be Indian and the place they occupied in the burgeoning nation as a minority population.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Asian Studies
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/00219118-11904195
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Many Lives of a Mughal King

Mirza Jaffer Abid
The Journal of Asian Studies
Islamic Studies and History
article

The Many Lives of a Mughal King

Mirza Jaffer Abid
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article presents a close reading of Aurangzēb ālamgīr par aik naẕar (1908), Shiblī Nuʿmānī’s (1857–1914) revisionist history of the Mughal emperor Aurangzeb, and its implications for thinking about secular politics in colonial India. At the cusp of the twentieth century, amid the rise of communal tensions, Aurangzeb found himself in the middle of public debates around India's national identity. Whereas upper-caste Hindu reformers and secular nationalists vilified Aurangzeb for his oppressive policies, Muslim reformers celebrated him for his efforts to bring India into conformity with a puritan brand of Islam. Intervening in the public and professional histories of the emperor, Nuʿmānī cast Aurangzeb as a “secular” ruler. Here the author attempts to analyze the variegated ways in which Nuʿmānī was thinking about pāltiks and the “secular” at a politically volatile moment in Indian history. In doing so the author attends to the effects that the imposition of Western secularism had on Nuʿmānī’s thought. Accordingly, the author analyzes how the processes of secularism in India transformed the ways in which its Muslim intellectuals were thinking about what it meant to be Indian and the place they occupied in the burgeoning nation as a minority population.

The Journal of Asian StudiesVol. 84(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.