Experiments in power-building: An intellectual history and comparative framework for informal worker organizing

This special issue examines how contemporary organizations of informal workers have experimented with power-building strategies across countries, employment sectors, and time periods. Its findings hold important lessons for our attempts to adapt to changing political and institutional structures and ultimately build a new model of social justice. In this introductory article, we first offer an intellectual history and motivation for the special issue, including the creation of the Experiences Organizing Informal Workers research network. We then review the comparative methodological approach used by all the articles in the special issue. Third, we draw on the rich case studies included in the special issue to offer an analytical framework with which to examine the relationship between informal workers’ collective action experiments from below and changing political institutions from above. This framework highlights four lenses: power resources, strategic and tactical repertoires, political opportunities, and dimensions of variation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Comparative Sociology
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00207152251368238
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiments in power-building: An intellectual history and comparative framework for informal worker organizing

Rina Agarwala, Chris Tilly
2 citations
International Journal of Comparative Sociology
Labor Movements and Unions
7.31
article

Experiments in power-building: An intellectual history and comparative framework for informal worker organizing

Rina Agarwala, Chris Tilly
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This special issue examines how contemporary organizations of informal workers have experimented with power-building strategies across countries, employment sectors, and time periods. Its findings hold important lessons for our attempts to adapt to changing political and institutional structures and ultimately build a new model of social justice. In this introductory article, we first offer an intellectual history and motivation for the special issue, including the creation of the Experiences Organizing Informal Workers research network. We then review the comparative methodological approach used by all the articles in the special issue. Third, we draw on the rich case studies included in the special issue to offer an analytical framework with which to examine the relationship between informal workers’ collective action experiments from below and changing political institutions from above. This framework highlights four lenses: power resources, strategic and tactical repertoires, political opportunities, and dimensions of variation.

International Journal of Comparative SociologyVol. 66(5)
Johns Hopkins University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Labor Movements and Unions
7.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Experiments in power-building: An intellectual history and comparative framework for informal worker organizing — Rina Agarwala, Chris Tilly · International Journal of Comparative Sociology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS