Leveraging on levers of control to learn how to integrate sustainability in management

Purpose This paper aimed to contribute to the current debate of scholars and practitioners about the fundamental challenge of embedding corporate sustainability within business operations. Design/methodology/approach Our study provides empirical evidence of how three Environmental Social Governance champions across different industries, progressively learn to integrate sustainability into management. To track the integration process, this paper took the perspective of management control systems (MCSs) operationalized by means of Simons' (1995) levers of control (LoC) model. This paper assumed that firms significantly leverage all LoC and learn progressively from intuiting to institutionalizing sustainability. Findings The findings confirm that sustainability integration is a dynamic, long-term process that unfolds through multiple learning loops. Belief and boundary systems often initiate the sustainability integration process. The design and use of diagnostic systems underlying the disclosure of the sustainability report are critical and crucial in the integration process. Interactive systems often operated as feedback and refinement mechanisms for both diagnostic and boundary systems. Research limitations/implications Our study may suffer from researchers’ bias; the case study method implies that our findings are not generalizable (Jans and Dittrich, 2008). With our work this paper contributed to highlight the transformative potential of MCSs. Practical implications With our work, this paper contributed to highlighting the transformative potential of MCSs. Social implications The framework guides managers to design and adapt their MCSs to foster a culture of continuous learning and genuine sustainability integration, demonstrating an aligned set of controls to the sustainable development goals, whose attainment requires unprecedented collaboration, practice and intellectual innovation. Originality/value The study suggests how to unlock value for companies and their stakeholders and create a sustainable future where people and the planet prosper together.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change
Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jaoc-02-2024-0064
Primary Topic
Accounting and Organizational Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging on levers of control to learn how to integrate sustainability in management

Laura Zoni, Camila Wainer Bustamante
Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change
Accounting and Organizational Management
article

Leveraging on levers of control to learn how to integrate sustainability in management

Laura Zoni, Camila Wainer Bustamante
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aimed to contribute to the current debate of scholars and practitioners about the fundamental challenge of embedding corporate sustainability within business operations. Design/methodology/approach Our study provides empirical evidence of how three Environmental Social Governance champions across different industries, progressively learn to integrate sustainability into management. To track the integration process, this paper took the perspective of management control systems (MCSs) operationalized by means of Simons' (1995) levers of control (LoC) model. This paper assumed that firms significantly leverage all LoC and learn progressively from intuiting to institutionalizing sustainability. Findings The findings confirm that sustainability integration is a dynamic, long-term process that unfolds through multiple learning loops. Belief and boundary systems often initiate the sustainability integration process. The design and use of diagnostic systems underlying the disclosure of the sustainability report are critical and crucial in the integration process. Interactive systems often operated as feedback and refinement mechanisms for both diagnostic and boundary systems. Research limitations/implications Our study may suffer from researchers’ bias; the case study method implies that our findings are not generalizable (Jans and Dittrich, 2008). With our work this paper contributed to highlight the transformative potential of MCSs. Practical implications With our work, this paper contributed to highlighting the transformative potential of MCSs. Social implications The framework guides managers to design and adapt their MCSs to foster a culture of continuous learning and genuine sustainability integration, demonstrating an aligned set of controls to the sustainable development goals, whose attainment requires unprecedented collaboration, practice and intellectual innovation. Originality/value The study suggests how to unlock value for companies and their stakeholders and create a sustainable future where people and the planet prosper together.

Journal of Accounting & Organizational ChangeVol. 21(7)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Accounting and Organizational Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.