Artificial intelligence in scientific research: Challenges, opportunities and the imperative of a human-centric synergy

• Artificial intelligence facilitates the shift from hypothesis-driven to data-driven research by improving the discovery and synthesis stages.. • Tools such as ChatGPT and Scite.ai simplify literature review, hypothesis generation and citation analysis. • Data quality is critical: poor data can lead to opaque models, impacting reproducibility and reliability. • Explainable AI (XAI) frameworks are emerging to address issues of transparency and interpretability in research. • Human expertise remains essential for validation and to ensure ethically valid and reproducible AI results. This work offers a critical and evidence-based synthesis of the conceptual, methodological, and social implications of artificial intelligence (AI) in scientific research, significantly enriched by an informetric perspective. The analysis transcends descriptive overviews and simple cataloging of products, providing a deeper understanding of the opportunities AI presents, such as accelerated data analysis, hypothesis generation, and drug discovery. At the same time, crucial challenges that AI introduces are explored, including knowledge monocultures, algorithmic bias, reproducibility issues, and the impact on research integrity and evaluation. The original contribution of this paper lies in the integration of informetric analysis to quantify the influence of AI on the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge, highlighting both its potential as an analytical tool and the risk of bias in the academic record. The paper emphasizes the need for frameworks that harmonize technological capabilities with the irreplaceable ingenuity of human thought, promoting balanced collaboration between AI and researchers, where AI serves as a tool to increase productivity and human oversight ensures ethical rigor, critical evaluation, and creative exploration.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Informetrics
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2025.101727
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence in scientific research: Challenges, opportunities and the imperative of a human-centric synergy

Fabio Scarpa, Francesco Branda, Massimo Ciccozzi
4 citations
Journal of Informetrics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
2.62
article

Artificial intelligence in scientific research: Challenges, opportunities and the imperative of a human-centric synergy

Fabio Scarpa, Francesco Branda, Massimo Ciccozzi
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• Artificial intelligence facilitates the shift from hypothesis-driven to data-driven research by improving the discovery and synthesis stages.. • Tools such as ChatGPT and Scite.ai simplify literature review, hypothesis generation and citation analysis. • Data quality is critical: poor data can lead to opaque models, impacting reproducibility and reliability. • Explainable AI (XAI) frameworks are emerging to address issues of transparency and interpretability in research. • Human expertise remains essential for validation and to ensure ethically valid and reproducible AI results. This work offers a critical and evidence-based synthesis of the conceptual, methodological, and social implications of artificial intelligence (AI) in scientific research, significantly enriched by an informetric perspective. The analysis transcends descriptive overviews and simple cataloging of products, providing a deeper understanding of the opportunities AI presents, such as accelerated data analysis, hypothesis generation, and drug discovery. At the same time, crucial challenges that AI introduces are explored, including knowledge monocultures, algorithmic bias, reproducibility issues, and the impact on research integrity and evaluation. The original contribution of this paper lies in the integration of informetric analysis to quantify the influence of AI on the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge, highlighting both its potential as an analytical tool and the risk of bias in the academic record. The paper emphasizes the need for frameworks that harmonize technological capabilities with the irreplaceable ingenuity of human thought, promoting balanced collaboration between AI and researchers, where AI serves as a tool to increase productivity and human oversight ensures ethical rigor, critical evaluation, and creative exploration.

Journal of InformetricsVol. 19(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
2.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial intelligence in scientific research: Challenges, opportunities and the imperative of a human-centric synergy — Fabio Scarpa, Francesco Branda, et al. · Journal of Informetrics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS