From ‘counterurbanisation as practice’ to the ‘governance of counterurbanisation’: Structuring pro-rural relocations through planning regulation of housing

Over the last four decades or more, counterurbanisation studies have focused on statistical analyses of deconcentrated population trends or demand-side explanations to understand ‘who’ is moving, ‘where’ and ‘why’. These studies, however, tend to overlook how individual preferences are ‘structured’ or influenced by supply-side enablers or constraints. In this paper, we argue that regulatory and policy regimes also matter in shaping counterurbanisation processes and outcomes. In other words, ‘counterurbanisation as practice’ intersects with the governance of counterurbanisation . We examine this theme through exploring the role of land-use planning in relation to regulating rural housing supply that enables or constrains counterurbanisation movements, drawing on Ireland as a case study. Utilising data from development plans, planning applications and a household survey, we evaluate the role of the planning system in identifying ‘where’ counterurbanisation is more likely to be accommodated through new development and in applying criteria in relation to ‘who’ is permitted to build a new rural property, including a range of social and economic criteria to determine an intrinsic need to live in a rural locality. This results in a group we identify as ‘familiar counterurbanisers’. We argue that rural housing policies have been constructed around a counterurbanisation narrative, resulting in policies that privilege selective pathways for counterurbanisers moving to rural localities, specifically for those with a pre-existing connection to rural places (e.g. family links, return migrants). • Counterurbanisation studies neglect how individual preferences are ‘structured’ by supply-side factors. • Regulatory regimes also matter in influencing counterurbanisation patterns. • We evaluate the planning system in Ireland in shaping pro-rural relocations. • This includes the location of new housing supply and through local ‘needs’ criteria. • Planning policy in Ireland privileges selective pathways for counterurbanisers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103868
Primary Topic
Rural development and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From ‘counterurbanisation as practice’ to the ‘governance of counterurbanisation’: Structuring pro-rural relocations through planning regulation of housing

Mark Scott, Menelaos Gkartzios, Luke Kelleher, Linda Fox‐Rogers
Journal of Rural Studies
Rural development and sustainability
article

From ‘counterurbanisation as practice’ to the ‘governance of counterurbanisation’: Structuring pro-rural relocations through planning regulation of housing

Mark Scott, Menelaos Gkartzios, Luke Kelleher, Linda Fox‐Rogers
article en

Abstract

Over the last four decades or more, counterurbanisation studies have focused on statistical analyses of deconcentrated population trends or demand-side explanations to understand ‘who’ is moving, ‘where’ and ‘why’. These studies, however, tend to overlook how individual preferences are ‘structured’ or influenced by supply-side enablers or constraints. In this paper, we argue that regulatory and policy regimes also matter in shaping counterurbanisation processes and outcomes. In other words, ‘counterurbanisation as practice’ intersects with the governance of counterurbanisation . We examine this theme through exploring the role of land-use planning in relation to regulating rural housing supply that enables or constrains counterurbanisation movements, drawing on Ireland as a case study. Utilising data from development plans, planning applications and a household survey, we evaluate the role of the planning system in identifying ‘where’ counterurbanisation is more likely to be accommodated through new development and in applying criteria in relation to ‘who’ is permitted to build a new rural property, including a range of social and economic criteria to determine an intrinsic need to live in a rural locality. This results in a group we identify as ‘familiar counterurbanisers’. We argue that rural housing policies have been constructed around a counterurbanisation narrative, resulting in policies that privilege selective pathways for counterurbanisers moving to rural localities, specifically for those with a pre-existing connection to rural places (e.g. family links, return migrants). • Counterurbanisation studies neglect how individual preferences are ‘structured’ by supply-side factors. • Regulatory regimes also matter in influencing counterurbanisation patterns. • We evaluate the planning system in Ireland in shaping pro-rural relocations. • This includes the location of new housing supply and through local ‘needs’ criteria. • Planning policy in Ireland privileges selective pathways for counterurbanisers.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 120
University College Dublin (IE), Middle East Technical University (TR), Research Center for Rural Economy (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Rural development and sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.