Evaluate design principles for flexible use of railway station areas: Through research-by-design and agent-based simulation

Design principles are widely used in the design field, yet some remain visionary rather than grounded in real-world applications. Assessing their effectiveness is therefore essential before implementation. This study focuses on a set of visionary design principles intended to promote the flexible use of railway station areas: (1) Ensuring event visibility by aligning paths and spaces; (2) Incorporating reconfigurable elements and reconfiguration-supportive layouts; (3) Establishing high-quality connections at different scales; (4) Adopting scattered layouts for high capacity or vibrancy; (5) Prioritizing core spaces for humans instead of vehicles. This study aims to address the gap in validating these design principles. Recognizing the potential of jointly employing research-by-design and agent-based simulation, this study presents a major research question : How effective are these design principles, as demonstrated through research-by-design (RbD) and agent-based simulation (ABS)? Methodologically , it first applies the design principles to Station Xtreme and generates multiple design proposals, then simulates the generated proposals, followed by assessments and reflections. The results suggest that the principles are generally effective, though limitations emerged: for example, quality connections may demand greater investment and space, while scattered layouts can increase wayfinding difficulty and operational complexity. This study contributes to the growing body of design knowledge by validating these flexible-use principles. It also introduces a transferable conceptual framework that integrates RbD and ABS, offering a novel methodological approach for testing other visionary design principles. • Five design principles for flexible station use are assessed. • A novel conceptual framework is proposed for design principle assessment. • Research-by-design and agent-based are employed. • Results show that design principles are generally effective, with a few limitations. • The study contributes to the methodology of design validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Building Engineering
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113775
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluate design principles for flexible use of railway station areas: Through research-by-design and agent-based simulation

Manuela Triggianese, F. van der Hoeven, Aoran Tian, Stefan van der Spek et al.
1 citations
Journal of Building Engineering
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
1.15
article

Evaluate design principles for flexible use of railway station areas: Through research-by-design and agent-based simulation

Manuela Triggianese, F. van der Hoeven, Aoran Tian, Stefan van der Spek, Chen Enshan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Design principles are widely used in the design field, yet some remain visionary rather than grounded in real-world applications. Assessing their effectiveness is therefore essential before implementation. This study focuses on a set of visionary design principles intended to promote the flexible use of railway station areas: (1) Ensuring event visibility by aligning paths and spaces; (2) Incorporating reconfigurable elements and reconfiguration-supportive layouts; (3) Establishing high-quality connections at different scales; (4) Adopting scattered layouts for high capacity or vibrancy; (5) Prioritizing core spaces for humans instead of vehicles. This study aims to address the gap in validating these design principles. Recognizing the potential of jointly employing research-by-design and agent-based simulation, this study presents a major research question : How effective are these design principles, as demonstrated through research-by-design (RbD) and agent-based simulation (ABS)? Methodologically , it first applies the design principles to Station Xtreme and generates multiple design proposals, then simulates the generated proposals, followed by assessments and reflections. The results suggest that the principles are generally effective, though limitations emerged: for example, quality connections may demand greater investment and space, while scattered layouts can increase wayfinding difficulty and operational complexity. This study contributes to the growing body of design knowledge by validating these flexible-use principles. It also introduces a transferable conceptual framework that integrates RbD and ABS, offering a novel methodological approach for testing other visionary design principles. • Five design principles for flexible station use are assessed. • A novel conceptual framework is proposed for design principle assessment. • Research-by-design and agent-based are employed. • Results show that design principles are generally effective, with a few limitations. • The study contributes to the methodology of design validation.

Journal of Building EngineeringVol. 112
Delft University of Technology (NL)
China Scholarship Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.