A framework to identify and value ecosystem services and disservices with supply and demand

Effective governance and management of ecosystem functions to promote human well-being and social equity require a clear understanding of supply and demand dynamics. While this is widely acknowledged in assessments of ecosystem services, it remains largely neglected for ecosystem disservices, despite many ecosystem functions generating both services (benefits) and disservices (costs) depending on spatial, temporal, and social contexts. To address this gap, we propose a conceptual framework for evaluating the supply of ecosystem functions in relation to stakeholder-specific demand for both services and the avoidance of disservices, supporting their integrated consideration in policy and management decisions. We demonstrate the framework's applicability by evaluating three ecosystem functions: herbivory, insect pollination, and nutrient cycling, using published data. Our analysis shows that each function produces substantial services and disservices depending on context, and highlights the need for context-targeted policies and management to reduce disservices while maintaining services. To this end, we suggest policies that influence demand (e.g. provide information about pollinator conservation to increase the willingness to pay for pollinator-induced seed set in otherwise seedless citrus), adjust incentive payments based on reduced ecosystem disservices (e.g. for agri-environmental actions that reduce nutrient emissions), or involve financial transfers from primary beneficiaries of services to those bearing disservice costs (e.g. moose hunters compensating forest owners for browsing damage). These cases highlight the importance of assessing supply and demand of both ecosystem services and disservices and show how our framework provides a flexible and practical tool for advancing context-sensitive policies and management to promote welfare and equity among stakeholders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Challenges
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2025.101306
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A framework to identify and value ecosystem services and disservices with supply and demand

J. A. Kristensen, William Sidemo‐Holm
Environmental Challenges
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

A framework to identify and value ecosystem services and disservices with supply and demand

J. A. Kristensen, William Sidemo‐Holm
article en

Abstract

Effective governance and management of ecosystem functions to promote human well-being and social equity require a clear understanding of supply and demand dynamics. While this is widely acknowledged in assessments of ecosystem services, it remains largely neglected for ecosystem disservices, despite many ecosystem functions generating both services (benefits) and disservices (costs) depending on spatial, temporal, and social contexts. To address this gap, we propose a conceptual framework for evaluating the supply of ecosystem functions in relation to stakeholder-specific demand for both services and the avoidance of disservices, supporting their integrated consideration in policy and management decisions. We demonstrate the framework's applicability by evaluating three ecosystem functions: herbivory, insect pollination, and nutrient cycling, using published data. Our analysis shows that each function produces substantial services and disservices depending on context, and highlights the need for context-targeted policies and management to reduce disservices while maintaining services. To this end, we suggest policies that influence demand (e.g. provide information about pollinator conservation to increase the willingness to pay for pollinator-induced seed set in otherwise seedless citrus), adjust incentive payments based on reduced ecosystem disservices (e.g. for agri-environmental actions that reduce nutrient emissions), or involve financial transfers from primary beneficiaries of services to those bearing disservice costs (e.g. moose hunters compensating forest owners for browsing damage). These cases highlight the importance of assessing supply and demand of both ecosystem services and disservices and show how our framework provides a flexible and practical tool for advancing context-sensitive policies and management to promote welfare and equity among stakeholders.

Environmental ChallengesVol. 20
University of Minnesota (US), Lund University (SE), Aarhus University (DK), Leverhulme Trust (GB), University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.