Evaluating temperature bias corrections in regional climate models: Insights from Rajkot's historical and future data

This study evaluates bias correction of the Regional Climate Model (RCM) outputs from the CORDEX South Asia dataset for Rajkot district of Gujarat, using data from the Indian Meteorological Department (IMD). It focused mainly on daily maximum and minimum temperatures during the historical period (1951-2005) and future projections (2006-2100) under RCP 2.6, RCP 4.5, and RCP 8.5. The bias correction method used was Gaussian distribution mapping, and statistical parameters such as monthly mean, coefficient of variation (CV), skewness (Cs), and kurtosis (Ck) were analysed. During the control period (1951-2005), raw RCM data was found underestimated than the observed IMD temperature data. After bias correction, monthly means closely matched the observations, with an R² of 1.00 for both maximum and minimum temperatures during calibration (1951-1995) and validation (1996-2005). The CV improved significantly after correction, with values aligning with IMD. However, the Gaussian method failed to correct higher-order moments such as skewness (Cs) remained negative during calibration but became positive for some months during validation, and kurtosis (Ck) stayed positive for all months, indicating the persistence of heavy-tailed distributions. For future scenarios (2006-2100), bias-corrected RCM data was found overestimated for monthly mean temperatures across all RCPs. The CV was consistently lower than in raw data. Skewness (Cs) and kurtosis (Ck) showed varied results: under RCP 2.6 and RCP 4.5, Cs was mostly positive in winter months, while Ck was positive in both summer and winter. Under RCP 8.5, skewness and kurtosis were positive for most months. Overall, Gaussian distribution mapping effectively corrected the mean temperature values and provided a solid foundation for temperature projections, making it a valuable method for adjusting climate models, though further refinement may be needed to address the extreme temperature events for enhanced climate resilience planning.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research in Agronomy
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060x.2025.v8.i9sa.3712
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating temperature bias corrections in regional climate models: Insights from Rajkot's historical and future data

Ananya Mishra, H. D. Rank
International Journal of Research in Agronomy
Climate variability and models
article

Evaluating temperature bias corrections in regional climate models: Insights from Rajkot's historical and future data

Ananya Mishra, H. D. Rank
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates bias correction of the Regional Climate Model (RCM) outputs from the CORDEX South Asia dataset for Rajkot district of Gujarat, using data from the Indian Meteorological Department (IMD). It focused mainly on daily maximum and minimum temperatures during the historical period (1951-2005) and future projections (2006-2100) under RCP 2.6, RCP 4.5, and RCP 8.5. The bias correction method used was Gaussian distribution mapping, and statistical parameters such as monthly mean, coefficient of variation (CV), skewness (Cs), and kurtosis (Ck) were analysed. During the control period (1951-2005), raw RCM data was found underestimated than the observed IMD temperature data. After bias correction, monthly means closely matched the observations, with an R² of 1.00 for both maximum and minimum temperatures during calibration (1951-1995) and validation (1996-2005). The CV improved significantly after correction, with values aligning with IMD. However, the Gaussian method failed to correct higher-order moments such as skewness (Cs) remained negative during calibration but became positive for some months during validation, and kurtosis (Ck) stayed positive for all months, indicating the persistence of heavy-tailed distributions. For future scenarios (2006-2100), bias-corrected RCM data was found overestimated for monthly mean temperatures across all RCPs. The CV was consistently lower than in raw data. Skewness (Cs) and kurtosis (Ck) showed varied results: under RCP 2.6 and RCP 4.5, Cs was mostly positive in winter months, while Ck was positive in both summer and winter. Under RCP 8.5, skewness and kurtosis were positive for most months. Overall, Gaussian distribution mapping effectively corrected the mean temperature values and provided a solid foundation for temperature projections, making it a valuable method for adjusting climate models, though further refinement may be needed to address the extreme temperature events for enhanced climate resilience planning.

International Journal of Research in AgronomyVol. 8(9S)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.