Advancing energy justice research: A comprehensive scientometric analysis of global trends and gaps

• Global push for clean energy intensifies, raising energy justice concerns. • Study employs bibliometrics to comprehensively assess 1497 documents (1983–2025). • Post-2015 sees a significant surge in energy justice research activity. • Evolving conceptual framework necessitates a nuanced understanding. • Research identifies factors, measurements, and impacts in energy justice discourse. Energy justice has emerged as a key area of study, focusing on addressing these inequities, particularly for marginalized and vulnerable communities. Despite the efforts of numerous scholars in this field, gaps persist in conceptual clarity, with energy justice often conflated with energy inequality. Aiming to enhance both theoretical understanding and practical applications of energy justice, this study employs bibliometrics and network analysis to examine 1497 documents sourced from the Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus databases spanning 1983–2025, using the VOSviewer and Biblioshiny packages of R software. It comprehensively reviews the research landscape, covering key authors, institutions, influential articles, collaborations, emerging topics, and trends, while also synthesizing contested issues in the field, such as the evolving concept of “energy justice”, its influencing factors, and policy recommendations. This study advances energy justice research by systematically analyzing its core dimensions, identifying research gaps, and guiding future inquiry, thus lowering entry barriers and enhancing scholarly efficiency in the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Futures
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101185
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing energy justice research: A comprehensive scientometric analysis of global trends and gaps

Tingting Zeng, Haitao Wu, Qiang Chen
Sustainable Futures
Energy and Environment Impacts
article

Advancing energy justice research: A comprehensive scientometric analysis of global trends and gaps

Tingting Zeng, Haitao Wu, Qiang Chen
article en

Abstract

• Global push for clean energy intensifies, raising energy justice concerns. • Study employs bibliometrics to comprehensively assess 1497 documents (1983–2025). • Post-2015 sees a significant surge in energy justice research activity. • Evolving conceptual framework necessitates a nuanced understanding. • Research identifies factors, measurements, and impacts in energy justice discourse. Energy justice has emerged as a key area of study, focusing on addressing these inequities, particularly for marginalized and vulnerable communities. Despite the efforts of numerous scholars in this field, gaps persist in conceptual clarity, with energy justice often conflated with energy inequality. Aiming to enhance both theoretical understanding and practical applications of energy justice, this study employs bibliometrics and network analysis to examine 1497 documents sourced from the Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus databases spanning 1983–2025, using the VOSviewer and Biblioshiny packages of R software. It comprehensively reviews the research landscape, covering key authors, institutions, influential articles, collaborations, emerging topics, and trends, while also synthesizing contested issues in the field, such as the evolving concept of “energy justice”, its influencing factors, and policy recommendations. This study advances energy justice research by systematically analyzing its core dimensions, identifying research gaps, and guiding future inquiry, thus lowering entry barriers and enhancing scholarly efficiency in the field.

Sustainable FuturesVol. 10
Zhongnan University of Economics and Law (CN), Shaoyang University (CN)
Major Program of National Fund of Philosophy and Social Science of China, National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Energy and Environment Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.