Engineering Portland cement and concrete with agricultural-origin functional additives: Valorization of agro-waste

Decarbonization, energy and resource efficiency, and the durability of construction activities have become critical issues in addressing several UN Sustainable Development Goals, including Life Below Water, Life on Land, Climate Action, Responsible Consumption and Production, Sustainable Cities and Communities, and Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure. The clinker, the primary constituent of Portland cement, is manufactured through a highly energy-intensive process that results in substantial CO₂ emissions. In this context, the agricultural-origin supplementary cementitious materials offer the possibility of a greener cement by partially replacing clinker and tuning the properties of Portland cement. Therefore, understanding the options of using different agricultural-origin supplementary cementitious materials is paramount. These agricultural-origin supplementary materials may include natural fibres, nanocellulose, lignin, plant extracts, agricultural waste ashes, and biochar. These are employed to partially replace clinker in Portland cement, as well as for reinforcement, fine aggregates, or other supplementary components in cement and concrete. This review article examines the applications of various agricultural-origin materials in cement and concrete, based on existing literature. It also reviews SWOT analyses and life cycle assessments, highlighting the promising environmental and economic benefits of these materials. However, the lack of standardization and supply chain inefficiencies remain significant barriers to their widespread adoption. • Clinker production is energy-intensive and contributes to CO 2 emissions. • No viable alternative to clinker, partial clinker replacement possible. • Agricultural-origin supplementary materials could replace clinker. • These are biopolymers, nanocellulose, lignin, plant extracts and biochar. • SWOT, LCA, and techno-economic assessments suggest standardization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Next Sustainability
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxsust.2025.100173
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engineering Portland cement and concrete with agricultural-origin functional additives: Valorization of agro-waste

Ashok K. Pandey, Sabrina A. Shaikh, Hemlata K. Bagla, Kuldeep Rajpurohit
4 citations
Next Sustainability
Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
2.43
article

Engineering Portland cement and concrete with agricultural-origin functional additives: Valorization of agro-waste

Ashok K. Pandey, Sabrina A. Shaikh, Hemlata K. Bagla, Kuldeep Rajpurohit
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Decarbonization, energy and resource efficiency, and the durability of construction activities have become critical issues in addressing several UN Sustainable Development Goals, including Life Below Water, Life on Land, Climate Action, Responsible Consumption and Production, Sustainable Cities and Communities, and Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure. The clinker, the primary constituent of Portland cement, is manufactured through a highly energy-intensive process that results in substantial CO₂ emissions. In this context, the agricultural-origin supplementary cementitious materials offer the possibility of a greener cement by partially replacing clinker and tuning the properties of Portland cement. Therefore, understanding the options of using different agricultural-origin supplementary cementitious materials is paramount. These agricultural-origin supplementary materials may include natural fibres, nanocellulose, lignin, plant extracts, agricultural waste ashes, and biochar. These are employed to partially replace clinker in Portland cement, as well as for reinforcement, fine aggregates, or other supplementary components in cement and concrete. This review article examines the applications of various agricultural-origin materials in cement and concrete, based on existing literature. It also reviews SWOT analyses and life cycle assessments, highlighting the promising environmental and economic benefits of these materials. However, the lack of standardization and supply chain inefficiencies remain significant barriers to their widespread adoption. • Clinker production is energy-intensive and contributes to CO 2 emissions. • No viable alternative to clinker, partial clinker replacement possible. • Agricultural-origin supplementary materials could replace clinker. • These are biopolymers, nanocellulose, lignin, plant extracts and biochar. • SWOT, LCA, and techno-economic assessments suggest standardization.

Next SustainabilityVol. 6
University of Mumbai (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
2.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.