Accelerating learning and impact in conservation by tailoring learning and adaptive management approaches to the stage of strategy development

Abstract Conservation has successes to celebrate, but it is not on track to achieve global goals for biodiversity, climate, and people. There is an urgent need to learn how to increase conservation impact by identifying more effective conservation actions and how to scale them. We provide a framework for selecting learning approaches that support adaptive management at different stages in the maturity of a strategy. We use case studies from The Nature Conservancy (TNC), a global conservation organization, to illustrate the framework. During the “emerging” stage, teams used relatively rapid evidence synthesizing and generating practices (e.g., interviews, focus groups, expert input, pilot tests) to develop ideas, check assumptions, and refine or reformulate their theory of change (TOC). During the “validating” stage, teams used impact and performance evaluations to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation actions to inform decisions to adjust their TOC, expand, or exit. We suggest that teams can use similar approaches during the “scaling” stage to evaluate scaling mechanisms and verify conservation effectiveness in new contexts. These case studies had one or more enabling conditions for learning (i.e., motivation from individuals, partners, or donors; clear learning agenda questions; special expertise or support; technical feasibility; adaptive management processes). In sum, we argue conservation could accelerate learning and impact by using more rapid learning practices early in strategy development and shifting to using more rigorous evaluation & learning as a strategy matures. Future research could help support learning during the “scaling” stage by advancing evaluation methods that are suitable to these situations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70117
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accelerating learning and impact in conservation by tailoring learning and adaptive management approaches to the stage of strategy development

Seth Morgan, Hari Shankar Sharma, Craig Leisher, Christina M. Kennedy et al.
2 citations
Conservation Science and Practice
Species Distribution and Climate Change
3.68
article

Accelerating learning and impact in conservation by tailoring learning and adaptive management approaches to the stage of strategy development

Seth Morgan, Hari Shankar Sharma, Craig Leisher, Christina M. Kennedy, Teresa B. Chapman, Joseph Fargione, Stephen A. Wood, Joe Kiesecker, Kei Sochi, Stevie Adams, Miguel Castro, Sheila M. W. Reddy, Nathan Karres, C. D. K. Herd, Rebecca Shirer, Daniela Lizano, A. Ritter, Kendra Opatovsky, Colleen Fugate, Lukindo Hiza, Rhita Simorangkir, David Abrahamson, Carol Bogezi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Conservation has successes to celebrate, but it is not on track to achieve global goals for biodiversity, climate, and people. There is an urgent need to learn how to increase conservation impact by identifying more effective conservation actions and how to scale them. We provide a framework for selecting learning approaches that support adaptive management at different stages in the maturity of a strategy. We use case studies from The Nature Conservancy (TNC), a global conservation organization, to illustrate the framework. During the “emerging” stage, teams used relatively rapid evidence synthesizing and generating practices (e.g., interviews, focus groups, expert input, pilot tests) to develop ideas, check assumptions, and refine or reformulate their theory of change (TOC). During the “validating” stage, teams used impact and performance evaluations to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation actions to inform decisions to adjust their TOC, expand, or exit. We suggest that teams can use similar approaches during the “scaling” stage to evaluate scaling mechanisms and verify conservation effectiveness in new contexts. These case studies had one or more enabling conditions for learning (i.e., motivation from individuals, partners, or donors; clear learning agenda questions; special expertise or support; technical feasibility; adaptive management processes). In sum, we argue conservation could accelerate learning and impact by using more rapid learning practices early in strategy development and shifting to using more rigorous evaluation & learning as a strategy matures. Future research could help support learning during the “scaling” stage by advancing evaluation methods that are suitable to these situations.

Conservation Science and PracticeVol. 7(11)
The Nature Conservancy (US), Yale University (US), The Nature Conservancy (CO), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
3.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.