Assessing the Potential of Caprine Collagen Type I in the Development of Medical Devices

We isolated collagen I from caprine, porcine, and bovine skin and tendon tissues and assessed their purity and chemical properties. We fabricated non-cross-linked and cross-linked scaffolds from each collagen I preparation and assessed their physicochemical and biological properties. Purity and chemical analyses did not reveal any notable differences between the groups. Fibril diameter analysis revealed that the non-cross-linked and cross-linked porcine, caprine, and bovine preparations resulted in scaffolds with the thickest, intermediate, and thinnest fibrils. Among the non-cross-linked scaffolds, no significant differences were observed in stress at break between the groups and the caprine scaffolds had significantly lower and higher strain at break and Young's modulus than the bovine and the porcine scaffolds. Cross-linking significantly increased stress at break of all scaffolds, strain at break of the caprine scaffolds, and Young's modulus of the bovine and porcine scaffolds. Biological analysis did not reveal any noteworthy differences between the groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomacromolecules
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5c00309
Primary Topic
Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Potential of Caprine Collagen Type I in the Development of Medical Devices

Gabriel Aguirre‐Álvarez, Alfonso López, Ignacio Sallent, Dimitrios I. Zeugolis
Biomacromolecules
Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
article

Assessing the Potential of Caprine Collagen Type I in the Development of Medical Devices

Gabriel Aguirre‐Álvarez, Alfonso López, Ignacio Sallent, Dimitrios I. Zeugolis
article en

Abstract

We isolated collagen I from caprine, porcine, and bovine skin and tendon tissues and assessed their purity and chemical properties. We fabricated non-cross-linked and cross-linked scaffolds from each collagen I preparation and assessed their physicochemical and biological properties. Purity and chemical analyses did not reveal any notable differences between the groups. Fibril diameter analysis revealed that the non-cross-linked and cross-linked porcine, caprine, and bovine preparations resulted in scaffolds with the thickest, intermediate, and thinnest fibrils. Among the non-cross-linked scaffolds, no significant differences were observed in stress at break between the groups and the caprine scaffolds had significantly lower and higher strain at break and Young's modulus than the bovine and the porcine scaffolds. Cross-linking significantly increased stress at break of all scaffolds, strain at break of the caprine scaffolds, and Young's modulus of the bovine and porcine scaffolds. Biological analysis did not reveal any noteworthy differences between the groups.

BiomacromoleculesVol. 26(10)
University College Dublin (IE), Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo (MX), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), Instituto de Ciencias Agrarias (ES), Universidad Politécnica de Puebla (MX), Regenerative Medicine Institute (MX), Ospedale di Mirano (IT)
Science Foundation Ireland, European Research Council, H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing the Potential of Caprine Collagen Type I in the Development of Medical Devices — Gabriel Aguirre‐Álvarez, Alfonso López, et al. · Biomacromolecules (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS