Artificial Intelligence and Liability for Damages

This study explores the evolving legal frameworks surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) liability at both international and national levels. As AI technologies increasingly operate with autonomy and unpredictability, traditional legal doctrines—such as fault-based liability and strict liability—face growing challenges. The article provides a comparative analysis of recent case law from China, Switzerland, Ireland, France, Germany, the Czech Republic, and the European Union, highlighting diverse judicial responses to AI-generated harms, including copyright infringement, product liability, and algorithmic decision-making. In particular, it examines landmark developments such as the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation 2024/1689) and the Council of Europe’s 2024 Framework Convention on AI and Human Rights. The study emphasizes the necessity of strengthening judicial oversight and national legislation in areas like criminal accountability, administrative transparency, and compensation mechanisms. Ultimately, the article offers a normative framework for establishing a more responsible, rights-based AI governance system. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Legal Liability, AI Act, Copyright, Product Liability, Algorithmic Accountability, Human Rights, EU Law, International Regulation, Judicial Oversight

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Sciences
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52096/usbd.9.41.16
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence and Liability for Damages

Fikret Ertan
International Journal of Social Sciences
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

Artificial Intelligence and Liability for Damages

Fikret Ertan
article en

Abstract

This study explores the evolving legal frameworks surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) liability at both international and national levels. As AI technologies increasingly operate with autonomy and unpredictability, traditional legal doctrines—such as fault-based liability and strict liability—face growing challenges. The article provides a comparative analysis of recent case law from China, Switzerland, Ireland, France, Germany, the Czech Republic, and the European Union, highlighting diverse judicial responses to AI-generated harms, including copyright infringement, product liability, and algorithmic decision-making. In particular, it examines landmark developments such as the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation 2024/1689) and the Council of Europe’s 2024 Framework Convention on AI and Human Rights. The study emphasizes the necessity of strengthening judicial oversight and national legislation in areas like criminal accountability, administrative transparency, and compensation mechanisms. Ultimately, the article offers a normative framework for establishing a more responsible, rights-based AI governance system. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Legal Liability, AI Act, Copyright, Product Liability, Algorithmic Accountability, Human Rights, EU Law, International Regulation, Judicial Oversight

International Journal of Social SciencesVol. 9(40)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.