Abundance Trends of Pacific Salmon During a Quarter Century of <scp>ESA</scp> Protection

ABSTRACT Between 1989 and 2007, 28 Distinct Population Segments (DPS) of Pacific salmon ( Oncorhynchus spp.) spawning in rivers in California and the Pacific Northwest (Oregon, Washington, Idaho) were listed (protected) under the US Endangered Species Act (ESA). In the roughly 25 years since then, considerable efforts have been made to recover these populations, but no DPS has increased sufficiently to be delisted. We evaluated abundance trends of ESA‐listed Pacific salmon DPS, along with DPS that were not ESA‐listed. Our goal was to evaluate whether protected DPS increased in abundance during the period of protection (nominally 1995–2020 in our study), either in absolute terms or relative to the unprotected DPS. A majority of the protected DPS had increasing abundance trends over this time period, and protected populations had higher median trends than non‐protected populations of the same species. Geographically, populations in the Pacific Northwest had higher median trends than those in California. Among species of protected populations, Chinook salmon ( O. tshawytscha ), chum salmon ( O. keta ) and sockeye salmon ( O. nerka ) had higher median trends than coho salmon ( O. kisutch ) and steelhead (anadromous O. mykiss ). For most DPS (listed and unlisted), trends in harvest rates and hatchery releases were relatively stable during the same time period, whereas trends in indicators related to freshwater and marine climate were generally negative for salmon. Our results suggest that salmon recovery actions may have helped to stabilise and increase protected DPS, but most remain far below their recovery goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fish and Fisheries
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.70019
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abundance Trends of Pacific Salmon During a Quarter Century of ESA Protection

David A. Boughton, Martin Liermann, Nathan J. Mantua, Steven T. Lindley et al.
4 citations
Fish and Fisheries
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
9.25
article

Abundance Trends of Pacific Salmon During a Quarter Century of ESA Protection

David A. Boughton, Martin Liermann, Nathan J. Mantua, Steven T. Lindley, Damon M. Holzer, William H. Satterthwaite, Heidi Fish, Andrew O. Shelton, Elizabeth E. Holmes, Rachel C. Johnson, Brian C. Spence, Chris E. Jordan, Laurie A. Weitkamp, James M. Myers, Michael J. Ford, Michael R. O’Farrell, Thomas H. Williams, Katie Barnas
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Between 1989 and 2007, 28 Distinct Population Segments (DPS) of Pacific salmon ( Oncorhynchus spp.) spawning in rivers in California and the Pacific Northwest (Oregon, Washington, Idaho) were listed (protected) under the US Endangered Species Act (ESA). In the roughly 25 years since then, considerable efforts have been made to recover these populations, but no DPS has increased sufficiently to be delisted. We evaluated abundance trends of ESA‐listed Pacific salmon DPS, along with DPS that were not ESA‐listed. Our goal was to evaluate whether protected DPS increased in abundance during the period of protection (nominally 1995–2020 in our study), either in absolute terms or relative to the unprotected DPS. A majority of the protected DPS had increasing abundance trends over this time period, and protected populations had higher median trends than non‐protected populations of the same species. Geographically, populations in the Pacific Northwest had higher median trends than those in California. Among species of protected populations, Chinook salmon ( O. tshawytscha ), chum salmon ( O. keta ) and sockeye salmon ( O. nerka ) had higher median trends than coho salmon ( O. kisutch ) and steelhead (anadromous O. mykiss ). For most DPS (listed and unlisted), trends in harvest rates and hatchery releases were relatively stable during the same time period, whereas trends in indicators related to freshwater and marine climate were generally negative for salmon. Our results suggest that salmon recovery actions may have helped to stabilise and increase protected DPS, but most remain far below their recovery goals.

Fish and FisheriesVol. 26(6)
NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US), NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Fisheries Science Center (US), NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest Fisheries Science Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
9.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.