Experiences of COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit Physicians and Hospital Administrators: Qualitative Findings from Focus Groups

Background: While quantitative research has determined that emotional distress and psychiatric illness among frontline healthcare workers increased with the COVID-19 pandemic, detailed qualitative data describing their personal experiences are needed in order to make appropriate plans to address provider mental health in future pandemics. This study aims to further explore the psychological effects of the pandemic on COVID-19 ICU clinicians and administrators through focus groups. Methods: Two separate 2-h focus groups of physicians were conducted, one with frontline faculty clinicians and another with administrators. Qualitative data analysis was conducted. Results: In September and November 2023, volunteer samples were recruited from the pulmonary and critical care medicine division of The University of Texas Southwestern physicians who served during the pandemic primarily as clinicians (N = 6) or in major administrative roles (N = 5). Perceptions of both administrators’ and clinicians’ pandemic experiences were coded into the same 7 qualitative themes: planning, sense of community and isolation, disparities and inequalities, communication and listening, leadership, effects of the pandemic, and emotional/psychiatric/coping responses. Effects of the pandemic were the most coded theme in both groups; second was disparities and inequalities for clinicians and pandemic planning for administrators. Thematic content is summarized separately for clinicians and administrators, illustrated with representative quotes. Conclusion: This study adds detailed qualitative findings to enrich existing quantitative knowledge on frontline COVID-19 workers’ emotional responses. Both clinicians and administrators identified helpful and non-helpful institutional responses. These findings are consistent with prior studies of disaster worker experiences and may help to inform efforts to address provider mental health in future pandemics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Mental Health Promotion
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32604/ijmhp.2025.066495
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiences of COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit Physicians and Hospital Administrators: Qualitative Findings from Focus Groups

E. Whitney Pollio, Carol S. North, Traci N. Adams, Leah Cohen et al.
International Journal of Mental Health Promotion
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
article

Experiences of COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit Physicians and Hospital Administrators: Qualitative Findings from Focus Groups

E. Whitney Pollio, Carol S. North, Traci N. Adams, Leah Cohen, R. Mehta, Haley Belt, Rosechelle Ruggiero, Hetal Patel
article en

Abstract

Background: While quantitative research has determined that emotional distress and psychiatric illness among frontline healthcare workers increased with the COVID-19 pandemic, detailed qualitative data describing their personal experiences are needed in order to make appropriate plans to address provider mental health in future pandemics. This study aims to further explore the psychological effects of the pandemic on COVID-19 ICU clinicians and administrators through focus groups. Methods: Two separate 2-h focus groups of physicians were conducted, one with frontline faculty clinicians and another with administrators. Qualitative data analysis was conducted. Results: In September and November 2023, volunteer samples were recruited from the pulmonary and critical care medicine division of The University of Texas Southwestern physicians who served during the pandemic primarily as clinicians (N = 6) or in major administrative roles (N = 5). Perceptions of both administrators’ and clinicians’ pandemic experiences were coded into the same 7 qualitative themes: planning, sense of community and isolation, disparities and inequalities, communication and listening, leadership, effects of the pandemic, and emotional/psychiatric/coping responses. Effects of the pandemic were the most coded theme in both groups; second was disparities and inequalities for clinicians and pandemic planning for administrators. Thematic content is summarized separately for clinicians and administrators, illustrated with representative quotes. Conclusion: This study adds detailed qualitative findings to enrich existing quantitative knowledge on frontline COVID-19 workers’ emotional responses. Both clinicians and administrators identified helpful and non-helpful institutional responses. These findings are consistent with prior studies of disaster worker experiences and may help to inform efforts to address provider mental health in future pandemics.

International Journal of Mental Health PromotionVol. 27(9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.