Resolving the Capacity‐Stability‐Cost Trilemma in Multi‐Principal‐Element Hydrogen Storage Alloys Through Multi‐Objective Optimization

Overcoming the capacity-stability-cost trilemma in hydrogen storage materials represents a fundamental Pareto-type challenge for practical metal hydride applications. Current research efforts remain fragmented, typically pursuing single-parameter optimization while lacking holistic approaches that concurrently satisfy all three criteria. Here, a novel design paradigm is proposed by orchestrating A/B-side multi-principal-element alloys (MPEAs) in C14 Laves phases, enabling concurrent optimization of interstitial hydrogen storage environments and thermodynamics. Through three consecutive elemental screening and precise composition engineering, the optimized Ti<sub>0.8</sub>Zr<sub>0.22</sub>Mn<sub>1.22</sub>Cr<sub>0.53</sub>(VFe)<sub>0.25</sub> MPEA achieves a breakthrough saturation capacity of 2.06 wt.% at 20 °C with merely 1.6 MPa electrolysis-derived hydrogen pressure. More significantly, this material maintains an exceptional reversible capacity of 1.93 wt.% at 80 °C (against 0.1 MPa back pressure), achieving an 93.7% capacity utilization efficiency. Such outstanding performance under limited operating conditions surpasses the vast majority of known C14 Laves-phase materials. Equally noteworthy is the superior structural-property robustness enabled by local strain release through timely pulverization during repeated hydrogen insertion/extraction, which results in negligible influence in hydrogen storage properties, crystallographic structure, or elemental distribution throughout extended cycling. These findings establish new design guidelines for high-capacity, long-cycle-life, low-cost hydrogen storage materials operating under energy-efficient conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Science
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202513463
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Hydrogen Storage and Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.07

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resolving the Capacity‐Stability‐Cost Trilemma in Multi‐Principal‐Element Hydrogen Storage Alloys Through Multi‐Objective Optimization

Xuezhang Xiao, Qin‐Yi Li, Yongpeng Chen, Qianwen Zhou et al.
4 citations
Advanced Science
Hydrogen Storage and Materials
2.07
article

Resolving the Capacity‐Stability‐Cost Trilemma in Multi‐Principal‐Element Hydrogen Storage Alloys Through Multi‐Objective Optimization

Xuezhang Xiao, Qin‐Yi Li, Yongpeng Chen, Qianwen Zhou, Nuo Lei, Haiwen Li, Lixin Chen, Dan Song, Wenzhe Liu, Panpan Zhou, Jinghua Jiang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Overcoming the capacity-stability-cost trilemma in hydrogen storage materials represents a fundamental Pareto-type challenge for practical metal hydride applications. Current research efforts remain fragmented, typically pursuing single-parameter optimization while lacking holistic approaches that concurrently satisfy all three criteria. Here, a novel design paradigm is proposed by orchestrating A/B-side multi-principal-element alloys (MPEAs) in C14 Laves phases, enabling concurrent optimization of interstitial hydrogen storage environments and thermodynamics. Through three consecutive elemental screening and precise composition engineering, the optimized Ti<sub>0.8</sub>Zr<sub>0.22</sub>Mn<sub>1.22</sub>Cr<sub>0.53</sub>(VFe)<sub>0.25</sub> MPEA achieves a breakthrough saturation capacity of 2.06 wt.% at 20 °C with merely 1.6 MPa electrolysis-derived hydrogen pressure. More significantly, this material maintains an exceptional reversible capacity of 1.93 wt.% at 80 °C (against 0.1 MPa back pressure), achieving an 93.7% capacity utilization efficiency. Such outstanding performance under limited operating conditions surpasses the vast majority of known C14 Laves-phase materials. Equally noteworthy is the superior structural-property robustness enabled by local strain release through timely pulverization during repeated hydrogen insertion/extraction, which results in negligible influence in hydrogen storage properties, crystallographic structure, or elemental distribution throughout extended cycling. These findings establish new design guidelines for high-capacity, long-cycle-life, low-cost hydrogen storage materials operating under energy-efficient conditions.

Advanced ScienceVol. 12(43)
Kyushu University (JP), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Hohai University (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Hydrogen Storage and Materials
2.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.