Measuring Growth Spillovers

ABSTRACT We propose a multilevel econometric model with time‐varying spillover parameters that disentangle within‐country from between‐country growth spillovers. Parameter estimation is carried out by the method of maximum likelihood. The finite‐sample properties of the resulting estimates are validated through a Monte Carlo study. We illustrate the model properties in an empirical application for six Latin American countries. The results show that our multilevel framework outperforms a benchmark model without the multilevel data structure. Specifically, the benchmark model tends to underestimate the spillover parameter compared to our multilevel approach. Also, the between‐country spillover is subject to cyclical dynamics, varying from negative to positive values, and suggests that growth in partner countries can either accelerate or decelerate their domestic growth. In contrast, all within‐country spillovers are positive and can be regarded as growth multipliers that reinforce internal economic dynamics within each country.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.70013
Primary Topic
Economic Policies and Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Growth Spillovers

James Sampi, Siem Jan Koopman, F. Blasques
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Economic Policies and Impacts
article

Measuring Growth Spillovers

James Sampi, Siem Jan Koopman, F. Blasques
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We propose a multilevel econometric model with time‐varying spillover parameters that disentangle within‐country from between‐country growth spillovers. Parameter estimation is carried out by the method of maximum likelihood. The finite‐sample properties of the resulting estimates are validated through a Monte Carlo study. We illustrate the model properties in an empirical application for six Latin American countries. The results show that our multilevel framework outperforms a benchmark model without the multilevel data structure. Specifically, the benchmark model tends to underestimate the spillover parameter compared to our multilevel approach. Also, the between‐country spillover is subject to cyclical dynamics, varying from negative to positive values, and suggests that growth in partner countries can either accelerate or decelerate their domestic growth. In contrast, all within‐country spillovers are positive and can be regarded as growth multipliers that reinforce internal economic dynamics within each country.

Oxford Bulletin of Economics and StatisticsVol. 88(2)
World Bank (US), Tinbergen Institute (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Danmarks Grundforskningsfond, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Economic Policies and Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.