Investigating the Effectiveness of the SAVI Learning Approach in Improving Critical and Analytical Mathematical Thinking

Background: Students’ ability to think critically and analytically in mathematics remains a central challenge in Indonesian education. Many instructional approaches in schools fail to adequately stimulate higher-order thinking. Traditional expository models, although commonly used, often lack the engagement required to foster meaningful learning. The SAVI (Somatic, Auditory, Visual, Intellectual) learning model offers an integrated and interactive alternative by combining physical activity, auditory input, visual aids, and intellectual reflection, aligning with multiple learning modalities. Aims: This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the SAVI instructional approach in improving students’ mathematical critical and analytical thinking skills. It specifically compares the outcomes of students taught using the SAVI model with those instructed through conventional expository teaching. Methods: A quasi-experimental research design with a posttest-only control group was used. The participants were 60 eighth-grade students from SMP Negeri 1 Mataram Baru during the 2023/2024 academic year. Students were divided into two groups: one receiving instruction via the SAVI approach and the other using the expository model. Essay-based assessments were used to evaluate students' critical and analytical thinking skills. The instruments were previously tested for validity and reliability. Data analysis was performed using Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) to evaluate differences between the two groups. Results: The results showed a significant difference in student performance between the two groups. Students in the SAVI group demonstrated higher scores in both critical and analytical mathematical thinking. MANOVA results revealed statistically significant values (p < 0.05), confirming the effectiveness of the SAVI model over the expository method. Conclusion: The SAVI instructional model significantly enhances students’ critical and analytical thinking in mathematics. Its multisensory design promotes deeper cognitive engagement, making it a promising approach for improving mathematical thinking at the secondary school level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Literacy Education
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64780/jole.v1i1.28
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the Effectiveness of the SAVI Learning Approach in Improving Critical and Analytical Mathematical Thinking

Fraulein Intan Suri, Bambang Sri Anggoro, Ita Purnama Jaya
Journal of Literacy Education
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
article

Investigating the Effectiveness of the SAVI Learning Approach in Improving Critical and Analytical Mathematical Thinking

Fraulein Intan Suri, Bambang Sri Anggoro, Ita Purnama Jaya
article en

Abstract

Background: Students’ ability to think critically and analytically in mathematics remains a central challenge in Indonesian education. Many instructional approaches in schools fail to adequately stimulate higher-order thinking. Traditional expository models, although commonly used, often lack the engagement required to foster meaningful learning. The SAVI (Somatic, Auditory, Visual, Intellectual) learning model offers an integrated and interactive alternative by combining physical activity, auditory input, visual aids, and intellectual reflection, aligning with multiple learning modalities. Aims: This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the SAVI instructional approach in improving students’ mathematical critical and analytical thinking skills. It specifically compares the outcomes of students taught using the SAVI model with those instructed through conventional expository teaching. Methods: A quasi-experimental research design with a posttest-only control group was used. The participants were 60 eighth-grade students from SMP Negeri 1 Mataram Baru during the 2023/2024 academic year. Students were divided into two groups: one receiving instruction via the SAVI approach and the other using the expository model. Essay-based assessments were used to evaluate students' critical and analytical thinking skills. The instruments were previously tested for validity and reliability. Data analysis was performed using Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) to evaluate differences between the two groups. Results: The results showed a significant difference in student performance between the two groups. Students in the SAVI group demonstrated higher scores in both critical and analytical mathematical thinking. MANOVA results revealed statistically significant values (p < 0.05), confirming the effectiveness of the SAVI model over the expository method. Conclusion: The SAVI instructional model significantly enhances students’ critical and analytical thinking in mathematics. Its multisensory design promotes deeper cognitive engagement, making it a promising approach for improving mathematical thinking at the secondary school level.

Journal of Literacy EducationVol. 1(1)
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung (ID)
Universitas Lampung
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.