Acts of International Organizations on Digital Economic Integration

This paper explores the regulatory frameworks and legal instruments of key international organizations (IOs) in fostering digital economic integration. Through a comparative legal-institutional analysis of acts and policy instruments issued by the United Nations, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), European Union (EU), African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), and Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), the study identifies trends, challenges, and synergies in regional and global digital trade governance. The research highlights varying levels of institutional maturity, digital inclusivity, and regulatory harmonization across IOs. The results underscore the importance of interoperable standards and collaborative approaches to bridge regulatory fragmentation and support cohesive digital trade governance worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Relations and Area Development
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64583/bg2nc959
Primary Topic
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acts of International Organizations on Digital Economic Integration

Yong Sarah Zhou, Zouting Ouyang
Journal of International Relations and Area Development
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
article

Acts of International Organizations on Digital Economic Integration

Yong Sarah Zhou, Zouting Ouyang
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the regulatory frameworks and legal instruments of key international organizations (IOs) in fostering digital economic integration. Through a comparative legal-institutional analysis of acts and policy instruments issued by the United Nations, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), European Union (EU), African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), and Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), the study identifies trends, challenges, and synergies in regional and global digital trade governance. The research highlights varying levels of institutional maturity, digital inclusivity, and regulatory harmonization across IOs. The results underscore the importance of interoperable standards and collaborative approaches to bridge regulatory fragmentation and support cohesive digital trade governance worldwide.

Journal of International Relations and Area DevelopmentVol. 1(1)
Belarusian State University (BY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.