When science isn’t beautiful: The effect of lab space aesthetics on participant performance of two Color Stroop tasks

Aesthetic experiences are a universal and constant phenomenon, affecting our decision making, job performance, and emotional reactivity. While the effects of aesthetic experiences reach far beyond the simple appreciation of art, most research in the field still focuses on subjective ratings of fine art. The current study explored the effect of decorating a lab space on a participant's inhibitory control and emotional reactivity. First, we used an online survey to confirm that participants found the aesthetic room (i.e., decorated lab space) more pleasing and comforting, and expressed a greater willingness to work in that space compared to the bare room. Next, participants performed a Proportion Congruent Stroop task to examine inhibitory control and a Emotion Vocabulary Stroop task to test inhibitory control in the context of emotional stimuli, or their emotional reactivity. Average response times on both tasks were faster in the aesthetic room, while accuracy did not differ between the rooms. These results suggest that participants in the bare room were less efficient at task performance. This research provides a controlled and standardized attempt at understanding the role that aesthetics plays in our daily lives by elaborating on the, understudied, link between aesthetics and inhibitory control.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/jyv29_v1
Primary Topic
Color perception and design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When science isn’t beautiful: The effect of lab space aesthetics on participant performance of two Color Stroop tasks

Kira Bailey, Chandler Eli Getty Carr, Audrey Propp, Kayla Saikaly
Color perception and design
article

When science isn’t beautiful: The effect of lab space aesthetics on participant performance of two Color Stroop tasks

Kira Bailey, Chandler Eli Getty Carr, Audrey Propp, Kayla Saikaly
article en

Abstract

Aesthetic experiences are a universal and constant phenomenon, affecting our decision making, job performance, and emotional reactivity. While the effects of aesthetic experiences reach far beyond the simple appreciation of art, most research in the field still focuses on subjective ratings of fine art. The current study explored the effect of decorating a lab space on a participant's inhibitory control and emotional reactivity. First, we used an online survey to confirm that participants found the aesthetic room (i.e., decorated lab space) more pleasing and comforting, and expressed a greater willingness to work in that space compared to the bare room. Next, participants performed a Proportion Congruent Stroop task to examine inhibitory control and a Emotion Vocabulary Stroop task to test inhibitory control in the context of emotional stimuli, or their emotional reactivity. Average response times on both tasks were faster in the aesthetic room, while accuracy did not differ between the rooms. These results suggest that participants in the bare room were less efficient at task performance. This research provides a controlled and standardized attempt at understanding the role that aesthetics plays in our daily lives by elaborating on the, understudied, link between aesthetics and inhibitory control.

Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Color perception and design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.