Optimizing Geothermal Wellbore Design: Evaluating the Trade-Offs Between Smaller and Larger Wellbore Designs

Abstract This paper presents a techno-economic analysis of geothermal wellbore design, comparing the performance and cost-effectiveness of different well architectures (5 ½ in.to 9 5/8 in. tubing/casing size) across two Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) configurations: a traditional EGS injector–producer pair and a single-well alternating injection/production system. The objective is to identify optimal wellbore designs that balance capital cost, thermal output, parasitic load, and mechanical integrity under specific reservoir conditions. A comprehensive simulation-based approach was used to evaluate key performance metrics, including surface production temperatures, parasitic loads, casing safety factors, and net power at resource temperatures of 200 °C and 300 °C. The analysis incorporated advanced well design software, thermodynamic modeling, and mechanical load assessments, including cyclic fatigue analysis. This paper does not serve as a prescriptive guide for wellbore selection design. Instead, it outlines a methodology to support the evaluation of wellbore architecture options. Although the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) is not addressed, drilling and casing cost estimates are provided to inform early-stage decisions when considering larger wellbore diameters. In the traditional EGS with the injector-producer configuration, the 9 5/8-inch tubing delivered the highest power output at both 200 °C (5.20 MWe) and 300 °C (19.16 MWe). However, at 200 °C, the 7-inch tubing—producing 4.17 MWe—may be a viable alternative when drilling costs are considered. Drilling a 9 5/8-inch wellbore was approximately 1.5 times more expensive than a 7-inch wellbore. Additionally, the 9 5/8-inch casing required significantly heavier material (47 pound/foot (lb/ft)) compared to the 7-inch casing (26 lb/ft), increasing material costs. It also necessitated a 13 3/8-inch casing weighing 72 lb/ft, further adding to expenses. At 300 °C, the performance gap between the 9 5/8-inch (19.16 MWe) and 7-inch (14.06 MWe) configurations is substantial, making the larger casing the more favorable option despite the higher cost. This work provides novel insights into the interplay between mechanical design, thermal efficiency, and economic viability in geothermal well construction. By integrating fatigue analysis, cyclic stress modeling, and considerations for drilling costs, the study offers a practical framework for optimizing wellbore architecture in next-generation geothermal systems. The findings support the development of scalable, cost-effective EGS projects and contribute to the broader goal of accelerating the global energy transition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2118/228364-ms
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Geothermal Wellbore Design: Evaluating the Trade-Offs Between Smaller and Larger Wellbore Designs

Lev Ring, E. Cambre, Phanish Suryanarayana, Saim Rahman et al.
5 links
Drilling and Well Engineering
article

Optimizing Geothermal Wellbore Design: Evaluating the Trade-Offs Between Smaller and Larger Wellbore Designs

Lev Ring, E. Cambre, Phanish Suryanarayana, Saim Rahman, R. Krishnamurthy, C. Dufrene
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents a techno-economic analysis of geothermal wellbore design, comparing the performance and cost-effectiveness of different well architectures (5 ½ in.to 9 5/8 in. tubing/casing size) across two Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) configurations: a traditional EGS injector–producer pair and a single-well alternating injection/production system. The objective is to identify optimal wellbore designs that balance capital cost, thermal output, parasitic load, and mechanical integrity under specific reservoir conditions. A comprehensive simulation-based approach was used to evaluate key performance metrics, including surface production temperatures, parasitic loads, casing safety factors, and net power at resource temperatures of 200 °C and 300 °C. The analysis incorporated advanced well design software, thermodynamic modeling, and mechanical load assessments, including cyclic fatigue analysis. This paper does not serve as a prescriptive guide for wellbore selection design. Instead, it outlines a methodology to support the evaluation of wellbore architecture options. Although the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) is not addressed, drilling and casing cost estimates are provided to inform early-stage decisions when considering larger wellbore diameters. In the traditional EGS with the injector-producer configuration, the 9 5/8-inch tubing delivered the highest power output at both 200 °C (5.20 MWe) and 300 °C (19.16 MWe). However, at 200 °C, the 7-inch tubing—producing 4.17 MWe—may be a viable alternative when drilling costs are considered. Drilling a 9 5/8-inch wellbore was approximately 1.5 times more expensive than a 7-inch wellbore. Additionally, the 9 5/8-inch casing required significantly heavier material (47 pound/foot (lb/ft)) compared to the 7-inch casing (26 lb/ft), increasing material costs. It also necessitated a 13 3/8-inch casing weighing 72 lb/ft, further adding to expenses. At 300 °C, the performance gap between the 9 5/8-inch (19.16 MWe) and 7-inch (14.06 MWe) configurations is substantial, making the larger casing the more favorable option despite the higher cost. This work provides novel insights into the interplay between mechanical design, thermal efficiency, and economic viability in geothermal well construction. By integrating fatigue analysis, cyclic stress modeling, and considerations for drilling costs, the study offers a practical framework for optimizing wellbore architecture in next-generation geothermal systems. The findings support the development of scalable, cost-effective EGS projects and contribute to the broader goal of accelerating the global energy transition.

Valeo Physical Therapy (United States) (US), Sage (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Drilling and Well Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.