An evolving view of character macroevolution

Phenotypes serve as the interface between organisms and their environments and are thus pivotal for comprehensive biological understanding. However, comparative analyses of species’ phenotypes must account for the non-independence of characters imposed by the branching pattern of macroevolution. Methods to account for this phylogenetic non-independence have historically been conceived of as their own subfield: “phylogenetic comparative methods” (PCMs). In this conceptualization, a researcher takes a pre-existing phylogenetic hypothesis and uses that phylogeny to “correct” for the non-independence of the character data that they wish to analyze. Here we argue that parallel developments in philosophy, data availability, computational capacity, and model development have led away from this classic view of PCMs and towards a new paradigm of character evolution, where patterns of character evolution are seen as intrinsically related to the diversification process, and thus should be inferred jointly with the tree rather than “reconstructed” on an existing phylogeny in a two-step process. In the context of this conceptual trajectory, we review historical milestones in studies of character macroevolution and discuss major recent conceptual and methodological advances, with an emphasis on the opportunities and insights provided by the joint inference perspective. We include primers on multiple current topics in character evolution, including: 1) state-dependent speciation and extinction models and the importance of cladogenetic change; 2) jointly modeling discrete and continuous characters; 3) accounting for hidden process variation in character evolution; 4) Joint inference in divergence-time estimation; 5) joint inference of phylogeny and ancestral sequences, and; 6) joint inference of alignment and phylogeny. The article concludes with a reflection on the future trajectory of these methods, emphasizing the interconnectedness of character evolution with broader processes in biology.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32942/x2892z
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An evolving view of character macroevolution

Michael L. May, Carrie M. Tribble, Carl J. Rothfels, Jesús Martínez‐Gómez
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

An evolving view of character macroevolution

Michael L. May, Carrie M. Tribble, Carl J. Rothfels, Jesús Martínez‐Gómez
article en

Abstract

Phenotypes serve as the interface between organisms and their environments and are thus pivotal for comprehensive biological understanding. However, comparative analyses of species’ phenotypes must account for the non-independence of characters imposed by the branching pattern of macroevolution. Methods to account for this phylogenetic non-independence have historically been conceived of as their own subfield: “phylogenetic comparative methods” (PCMs). In this conceptualization, a researcher takes a pre-existing phylogenetic hypothesis and uses that phylogeny to “correct” for the non-independence of the character data that they wish to analyze. Here we argue that parallel developments in philosophy, data availability, computational capacity, and model development have led away from this classic view of PCMs and towards a new paradigm of character evolution, where patterns of character evolution are seen as intrinsically related to the diversification process, and thus should be inferred jointly with the tree rather than “reconstructed” on an existing phylogeny in a two-step process. In the context of this conceptual trajectory, we review historical milestones in studies of character macroevolution and discuss major recent conceptual and methodological advances, with an emphasis on the opportunities and insights provided by the joint inference perspective. We include primers on multiple current topics in character evolution, including: 1) state-dependent speciation and extinction models and the importance of cladogenetic change; 2) jointly modeling discrete and continuous characters; 3) accounting for hidden process variation in character evolution; 4) Joint inference in divergence-time estimation; 5) joint inference of phylogeny and ancestral sequences, and; 6) joint inference of alignment and phylogeny. The article concludes with a reflection on the future trajectory of these methods, emphasizing the interconnectedness of character evolution with broader processes in biology.

National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An evolving view of character macroevolution — Michael L. May, Carrie M. Tribble, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS