Emotional Responses to AI Use: Development of the SAGAT Scale for Shame and Guilt

The rise of generative AI tools has introduced new ethical dilemmas and emotional responses, yet little research has examined users’ social emotions such as shame, guilt, and impostor syndrome. This paper presents the SAGAT (Shame and Guilt towards AI Tools) scale, a 9-item psychometric instrument developed to measure these emotions in AI tool usage. Two cross-sectional studies confirmed a three-factor structure: AI Shame, AI Guilt, and AI Impostor syndrome, with strong internal reliability (α ≥ 0.75). The scale demonstrates measurement invariance across genders and predicts AI tool use frequency: guilt and impostor feelings are negatively associated, while shame is positively associated. Convergent and divergent validity were also supported. Emotional responses to AI appear to shape user experience and adoption, particularly in education and knowledge work. The SAGAT scale offers a novel way to assess affective dimensions of AI-human interaction, informing ethical design, AI literacy, and responsible integration of AI in society.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/3w4cy_v1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emotional Responses to AI Use: Development of the SAGAT Scale for Shame and Guilt

Simone Grassini, Danilo Menicucci, Enrico Cipriani, Alberto Greco
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Emotional Responses to AI Use: Development of the SAGAT Scale for Shame and Guilt

Simone Grassini, Danilo Menicucci, Enrico Cipriani, Alberto Greco
article en

Abstract

The rise of generative AI tools has introduced new ethical dilemmas and emotional responses, yet little research has examined users’ social emotions such as shame, guilt, and impostor syndrome. This paper presents the SAGAT (Shame and Guilt towards AI Tools) scale, a 9-item psychometric instrument developed to measure these emotions in AI tool usage. Two cross-sectional studies confirmed a three-factor structure: AI Shame, AI Guilt, and AI Impostor syndrome, with strong internal reliability (α ≥ 0.75). The scale demonstrates measurement invariance across genders and predicts AI tool use frequency: guilt and impostor feelings are negatively associated, while shame is positively associated. Convergent and divergent validity were also supported. Emotional responses to AI appear to shape user experience and adoption, particularly in education and knowledge work. The SAGAT scale offers a novel way to assess affective dimensions of AI-human interaction, informing ethical design, AI literacy, and responsible integration of AI in society.

Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.