Taken at Face Value: Do Robots Trigger Face-Typical Processing?

Social robots are increasingly integrated into everyday environments, yet effective and socially engaging interactions remain a challenge – particularly due to difficulties in interpreting the robots’ internal states and behaviors. A key obstacle is that robots often fail to engage the social cognitive mechanisms typically elicited by human interaction partners. Human faces, in particular, are processed holistically through specialized neural networks that support rapid inferences about identity, emotion, and intention. In contrast, robot faces vary widely in their resemblance to the human face configuration, both in terms of the number (i.e., eyes, eyebrows, nose, mouth), and the arrangement of features (e.g., eyes-over-nose-over-mouth), raising the question of whether they elicit human-level face processing. Building on previous research, we use the face inversion paradigm to examine whether and under which conditions robot faces are processed in a face-typical manner. Experiment 1 demonstrated enhanced face-typical processing when robot faces incorporated three or four vs one or two human facial features. Experiment 2 showed that this ‘number effect’ was specific to distinctly human facial features vs non-human features. Comparisons to data from previous experiments suggest that synthetic faces with a high number of human-like features engage holistic face processing comparable to that seen with real human faces. Given the link between holistic face processing and the attribution of mental states and higher-order social cognition, these results may indicate that meticulous facial design could make robots appear more social, which in turn could promote social cognition in human-robot interactions.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qpfm4_v2
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taken at Face Value: Do Robots Trigger Face-Typical Processing?

Eva Wiese, Kurt Hugenberg, Tobias Feldmann‐Wüstefeld, Ali Momen
1 links
Face Recognition and Perception
article

Taken at Face Value: Do Robots Trigger Face-Typical Processing?

Eva Wiese, Kurt Hugenberg, Tobias Feldmann‐Wüstefeld, Ali Momen
article en

Abstract

Social robots are increasingly integrated into everyday environments, yet effective and socially engaging interactions remain a challenge – particularly due to difficulties in interpreting the robots’ internal states and behaviors. A key obstacle is that robots often fail to engage the social cognitive mechanisms typically elicited by human interaction partners. Human faces, in particular, are processed holistically through specialized neural networks that support rapid inferences about identity, emotion, and intention. In contrast, robot faces vary widely in their resemblance to the human face configuration, both in terms of the number (i.e., eyes, eyebrows, nose, mouth), and the arrangement of features (e.g., eyes-over-nose-over-mouth), raising the question of whether they elicit human-level face processing. Building on previous research, we use the face inversion paradigm to examine whether and under which conditions robot faces are processed in a face-typical manner. Experiment 1 demonstrated enhanced face-typical processing when robot faces incorporated three or four vs one or two human facial features. Experiment 2 showed that this ‘number effect’ was specific to distinctly human facial features vs non-human features. Comparisons to data from previous experiments suggest that synthetic faces with a high number of human-like features engage holistic face processing comparable to that seen with real human faces. Given the link between holistic face processing and the attribution of mental states and higher-order social cognition, these results may indicate that meticulous facial design could make robots appear more social, which in turn could promote social cognition in human-robot interactions.

Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Face Recognition and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.